This study aims to assess a mobile app called MAYA for use in middle-aged and older adults with anxiety or mood disorders. The MAYA app is designed to teach coping skills for anxiety and depression that are drawn from cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants will be asked to use the app for at least two days a week, 20 minutes on each day, for six weeks. Participants will have weekly check-ins as well as longer assessments at the beginning of the study, week 3, week 6 (end of treatment), and week 12 (follow up). During assessments, participants will answer brief questionnaires designed to assess their symptoms and impressions of the app. The main hypotheses of the study are that participants will complete most of the assigned sessions and that they will rate their impressions of the app highly. The secondary hypotheses are that symptoms of depression and anxiety will decrease with use of the MAYA app.
There is a growing need for accessible, affordable, research-supported treatments designed for older adults. Older adults face challenges that limit their ability to physically access mental health services; thus, mobile app-based interventions may be particularly appealing to individuals in this age range with anxiety or depression who are unable to access more traditional psychotherapy administered in person by a therapist. Mobile technology has been used previously to deliver mental health services for adults with a variety of psychiatric symptoms (Dennis \& O'Toole, 2014). Anxiety frequently co-occurs with depression, with 72% of individuals with anxiety having experienced a history of depression (Moffitt et al., 2007). Current models conceptualize anxiety and depression as a confluence of three broad symptom categories - physiological hyperarousal, low positive affect, and high negative affect (Clark \& Watson, 1991) - that are present to different degrees in different individuals. This study aims to assess the acceptability, feasibility and efficacy of "MAYA", a mobile cognitive behavioral therapy app for anxiety and mood disorders, in middle aged and older adults. This study will collect pilot data over the course of 12 weeks. As this is a pilot study, all participants will use the same version of the app and there will be no control group. Participants will be asked to use the mobile app for at least two days a week, for at least 20 minutes on each day, for 6 weeks. Participants will have weekly check-ins in person or via a HIPAA-compliant virtual meeting platform (e.g., Zoom) to assess intervention adherence and answer brief questionnaires designed to assess feasibility, acceptability, and mood symptoms at baseline, week 3, week 6 (end of treatment), and week 12 (follow up). Participants can complete optional recordings of electrical brain activity (electroencephalography, or EEG) at baseline and week 6.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
The mobile cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) application, MAYA, teaches cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques including emotion monitoring, cognitive restructuring, mindfulness, exposure and psychoeducation (i.e. information about anxiety and depression). The application includes an interactive dashboard to provide the user with statistics for tracking progress toward their goals. Although the MAYA application is new, its content and structure are similar to how CBT- a well-established and widely used psychosocial intervention - is commonly delivered in the more traditional setting of a psychotherapist's office.
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITINGAcceptability of the MAYA application as measured by mean uMARS scores at Baseline
The primary measure to assess accessibility of the MAYA app will be the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). The uMARS is a 26-item questionnaire that evaluates the quality of the mobile health applications with six subscales: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, app subjective quality, perceived impact. Scores on the scale can range from 21 to 130, where higher scores represent higher quality of mobile health applications by end-users.
Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline)
Acceptability of the MAYA application as measured by mean uMARS scores at Midpoint
The primary measure to assess accessibility of the MAYA app will be the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). The uMARS is a 26-item questionnaire that evaluates the quality of the mobile health applications with six subscales: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, app subjective quality, perceived impact. Scores on the scale can range from 21 to 130, where higher scores represent higher quality of mobile health applications by end-users.
Time frame: Week 3 (Midpoint)
Acceptability of the MAYA application as measured by mean uMARS scores at Endpoint
The primary measure to assess accessibility of the MAYA app will be the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). The uMARS is a 26-item questionnaire that evaluates the quality of the mobile health applications with six subscales: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, app subjective quality, perceived impact. Scores on the scale can range from 21 to 130, where higher scores represent higher quality of mobile health applications by end-users.
Time frame: Week 6 (Endpoint)
Feasibility of the MAYA application as measured by total number of sessions completed in the MAYA application at Endpoint
Total number of sessions completed by the end of the administered intervention
Time frame: Week 6 (Endpoint)
Feasibility of the MAYA application as measured by total number of sessions completed in the MAYA application at Follow Up
Total number of sessions completed by the end of the administered intervention
Time frame: Week 12 (Follow Up)
Change in anxiety symptoms as measured by the HAM-A
The primary symptom measure for anxiety will be the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). The HAM-A is a 14-item questionnaire measure of the severity of anxiety symptoms. The items measure both psychic anxiety and somatic anxiety. The scores range from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate a greater severity of symptoms and lower scores indicate mild to no anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), and Week 12 (Follow Up)
Change in depressive symptoms as measured by the MADRS
Depression will be measured using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the severity of depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate higher severity of depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), and Week 12 (Follow Up)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.