To compare three different oral hygiene regimens on changes in gum tissue appearance, gum bleeding, and plaque scores.
The goal of this clinical trial was to compare the effect of different battery powered water in and adult population with mild to moderate gingivitis. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is there a difference between the two water flosser devices on gum bleeding scores? * Is there a difference between the two water flosser devices on plaque accumulation and removal? * Is there a difference between the two water flosser devices on signs of gingivitis? Researchers will compare the two groups using a water flosser (experimental) to see how it compares to traditional brushing and flossing (control).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
105
A pulsating water flosser and jet tip designed to clean between the teeth and below the gingival margin.
A water flosser and specialized tip that delivers water with microbubbles of air
Nylon string used to clean between the teeth manually
All Sum Research Center Ltd.
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Bleeding on probing
Bleeding recorded on 6 sites per tooth within 30 seconds of instrumentation. 0 = no bleeding, 1= bleeding. Bleeding determined by number of sites bleeding divided by total number of sites = percent bleeding
Time frame: 4 weeks
Modified gingival index
Visual assessment of the gingival tissue. 0 = absence of inflammation, 1 = mild inflammation (slight change in color, little change in texture of any porting of but not the entire marginal or papillary gingival area), 3 = moderate inflammation (glazing, redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival area), 4 = severe inflammation (marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival area, spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Rustogi Modification of Navy Plaque Index
Plaque is assessed for each tooth area (divided into 9 sections labeled A through I) and scored using the following scale: 0 = absent, and 1 = present. Facial and lingual surfaces of all gradable teeth are scored and a mean plaque index is calculated for each subject at each examination. Subjects' scores were calculated for whole mouth (A through I), along the gingival margin (A through C), and at the proximal (approximal) areas (D and F).
Time frame: 4 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.