Group-based [ADAPT] Versus One-to-one [Usual] Occupational Therapy: A Pilot and Feasibility Study

Parker Research Institute12 enrolled

Overview

Background: The number of people living with chronic conditions limiting the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) tasks is increasing. Occupational therapists are trained to deliver interventions to improve ADL ability. Municipality occupational therapy interventions are usually delivered as one-to-one sessions in the client´s home. While this intervention format might be effective, a group-based intervention format might be as effective but more cost-effective? Hence, the group-based ADAPT program was developed, piloted and evaluated for its functioning and feasibility in municipality settings. These studies provided initial evidence for the ADAPT Programs effectiveness. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is however needed to document effectiveness, processes, and cost-effectiveness of the ADAPT program versus usual occupational therapy (UOT) for people with chronic conditions. Prior to the RCT, this pilot and feasibility study will be conducted to test aspects of trial design, conduct and processes as well as intervention content and delivery. Material and Methods: A total of 16 home dwelling persons with chronic conditions, experiencing ADL task performance problems will be randomized and allocated to receive ADAPT (intervention) or UOT (control). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness assessments are collected at baseline and post intervention i.e., 3-months (week 12) and 6-months (week 26) from baseline. Pilot and feasibility aspects will be evaluated by means of registrations forms filled out by the OTs delivering ADAPT and people with chronic conditions attending ADAPT. Registrations are designed to inform aspects of 1) recruitment and retention, 2) trial participation, 3) impact of trial on participants and staff, 4) completion rates, 5) fidelity and dose 6) assesable information and 7) adaptation of trial conduct to local context. Progression criteria for when to 'go', 'amend' or 'be alert/stop' are defined, to support the decision on whether to continue to RCT or the need to adjust design or procedures,

TThe specific aims of this pilot and feasibility study are to evaluate: 1. how recruitment procedures work and if participants accept randomization (recruitment and retention) 2. if clients feel adequately informed about the purpose of the assessments done and the content and time use regarding interventions delivered (trial participation) 3. if trial participation has unanticipated impacts on ADAPT OTs (e.g. workload) (Impact of trial on staff) 4. if registration forms and outcome measurements are completed (Completion rates) 5. the extent of which the ADAPT OT adhere to the ADAPT program manual and deliver key components within each session (fidelity and dose) 6. if data informing about intervention delivered in UOT is accessible from client records (Assessable information) 7. if ADAPT OTs perceive organizational factors to facilitate or hinder program delivery (adaptation of trial conduct to local context)?

Interventions

ADAPT programOTHER

The ADAPT program is a structured and individualized group-based program, in which two occupational therapists teach groups of people the skills of problem-solving more efficiently as means to overcome ADL task performance problems. The ADAPT program 3.0 includes 10 two-hour sessions and is followed by two booster sessions to support sustainable gains.

UOTOTHER

UOT is delivered by one occupational therapist. Sessions are individualised and focus on improving ADL ability e.g. by practicing the performance of ADL task. UOT typiccally includes 7 one-to-one sessions of 60 minutes, delivered over a 10-week period in the clients´ homes. The dose is however not fixed but based on the occupational therapists´ clinical judgement.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * ≥ 18 years of age * ≥ one year since medical diagnosed with one or more chronic conditions * Lives in own home * Experience ADL task performance problems * Show ADL motor ability measures \<1.50 on the AMPS ADL motor skills scale (indicate increased effort during ADL task performance) * Communicate independently and relevantly orally and in writing (without severe cognitive deficits, aphasia, significant hearing loss or dyslexia) * Willing and interested in attending occupational therapy interventions focused on improving ADL task performance. Exclusion Criteria: * ADL process ability measures \<0.00 indicating that the person is unlikely to profit from educational programs focused on using adaptational strategies * Mental illness and/or other acute (\<3 months) conditions effecting ADL task performance * Language barriers * Known substance abuse

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in observed motor ability

Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a unidimensional linear measure in which higher scores are better outcome

Time frame: week 12

Secondary Outcomes

Change in self-reported ability to perform activities of daily living tasks

ADL-Interview (ADL-I, Performance) is a unidimensional linear measure in which higher scores are better outcome

Time frame: week 12 and 26

Change in observed motor ability

Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a unidimensional linear measure in which higher scores are better outcome

Time frame: week 26

Change in observed process ability

Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a unidimensional linear measure in which higher scores are better outcome

Time frame: week 12 and 26

Change in self-reported satisfaction with ability to perform activities of daily living tasks-

ADL-Interview (ADL-I Satisfaction)

Time frame: week 12 and 26

Perceived change in ability to perform activities of daily living tasks