The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about long term outcomes in Supracondylar Humeral Fracture in children after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * how good is the elbow function * what are the post-operative complication * what is the time before return to sport * what is the aesthetic prejudice of the scar for the patient Participants will answer questionnaries and send photographs of their elbows to the examinator
Elbow fractures represent 5% of total fracture in children. Supracondylar humeral fractures compound half of them. As distal humerus is responsible for only 20% of humeral growth, bone remodelage her is less important compared to other sites in children.. Many different attitudes are possible : orthopedic reduction, open reduction, percutaneous pinning ... No methode as clearly demontrated a superiority. Percutaneous pinning as been widely used the last years though We haven't find any study evaluating long term outcomes regarding functionnal and aesthetic outcomes in supracondylar humeral fracture treated by percutaneous pinning.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
634
functional outcome after supracondylar humeral fracture
Pediatric-Adolescent Shoulder and Elbow Survey (PEDI ASES), rate from 0 to 84, 0 is poor and 84 is excellent
Time frame: 1 day
functional outcome after supracondylar humeral fracture
FLYNN'S CRITERIA
Time frame: 1 day
functional outcome after supracondylar humeral fracture
range of motion mesured in degrees
Time frame: 1 day
post operative complication
identify number and type of complication
Time frame: 1 day
time before return to sport
time in days before return to sport
Time frame: 1 day
aesthetical prejudice
The Patient and Observer Scar Assement Scale (POSAS), rate from 7 to 70, 7 is excellent and 70 is poor
Time frame: 1 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.