This phase II trial compares the effect of short course radiotherapy (RT) to standard course RT for the treatment of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM). The researchers want to learn whether the shorter course treatment is non-inferior (not worse than the standard of care), for patients with GBM. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Short course radiotherapy delivers higher doses of radiation over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To demonstrate non-inferior 12-month overall survival (OS) of patients with GBM treated with dose escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to standard of care. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To demonstrate the safety of short-course radiotherapy via physician-reported grade (G) 3+ toxicity. II. To explore patient-reported outcomes to demonstrate favorable quality of life with short-course radiotherapy for GBM. III. To analyze the impact of shortening the treatment duration on treatment related lymphopenia and absolute lymphocyte counts. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the cost-effectiveness of the 5-fraction treatment regimen compared to standard of care. II. To explore the impact on the immune system with the 5-fraction treatment regimen. Immune phenotyping will be assessed by Flow Cytometry and cytometry by flight (CyTOF). III. To analyze series of cytokine levels over time. IV. To assess patterns of failure, specifically focusing on differences in volume delineation via Fluorodopa F 18 (FDOPA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and recurrences in-field versus (vs.) out of field. V. To conduct a subgroup analysis for just patients =\< 65 cc. VI. To conduct a subgroup analysis for just patients with and without tumor treating fields. VII. To analyze patient demographic data compared to historical controls to determine whether the short-course treatment regimen improves access to underserved populations. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients undergo short course RT for 5-10 fractions over 1-2 weeks on study. Patients also receive temozolomide orally (PO) on days 1-5 every 28 days during radiation therapy. Starting one month post-radiation, patients continue temozolomide on days 1-5 every 28 days for up to 5 adjuvant cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients undergo standard course RT for 15-30 fractions over 3-6 weeks on study. Patients also receive temozolomide PO daily (QD) concurrently with radiation therapy and for up to 6 adjuvant cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients undergo positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18-F-DOPA administered intravenously (IV) prior to RT on study, and undergo MRI prior to RT and throughout the trial. Patients may optionally undergo blood sample collection during screening and on the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 2 months for the first year, every 3 months for the second year, and every 4 months for the third year. After 3 years, clinical outcomes are monitored at least once a year until 5 years after treatment.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea
Albert Lea, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Health Systems-Mankato
Proportion of patients alive [overall survival (OS)] at 12 months
OS is defined as the time from study registration to death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to 12 months after enrollment
Proportion of patients whose radiation oncologist reported a grade 3+ toxicity
Pretreatment symptoms/conditions will be graded at enrollment by the radiation oncology team and updated at each evaluation. Adverse Events will be calculated using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Time frame: 30-, 90-, and 180-days post-radiotherapy (RT)
Quality of life: EORTC QLQ-C30
Assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a 30 item questionnaire used to assess quality of life in cancer patients. Questions are answered using a 4-point Likert scale where 1=not at all and 4=very much, except for two items which use a 7-point scale where 1=very poor and 7=excellent. Higher scores on the questions answered 1-4 indicate more severe symptoms and greater difficulty. Higher scores on the 1-7 scales indicate better overall health and quality of life.
Time frame: From baseline up to 3 years
Quality of life: EORTC QLQ-BN20
Assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Brain Neoplasm (QLQ-BN20), which consists of 20 questions answered using a 4-point Likert scale where 1=not at all and 4=very much. Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms.
Time frame: From baseline up to 3 years
Lymphocyte count
Assessed by blood test, lymphocyte count will be compared between arms by change in count from pretreatment to end of RT.
Time frame: From baseline up to 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
170
Undergo MRI
Undergo PET
Ancillary studies
Complete questionnaires
Undergo standard course RT
Given PO
Undergo blood sample collection
Mankato, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Radiation Therapy - Northfield
Northfield, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States