This phase I/II open-label, dose-finding, multi-center study will assess safety and primary efficacy of Onureg and Venetoclax combination, to define the optimal biological dose and optimal treatment duration of Onureg to be used along with Venetoclax for further studies in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) not eligible to transplant.
During phase I, three dose features of Onureg will be tested in combination with a fixed dose of Venetoclax to define the optimal biological dose for phase II. The phase II will assess safety and primary efficacy of Onureg and Venetoclax combination, to define the optimal biological dose and optimal treatment duration of Onureg to be used along with Venetoclax for further studies in previously untreated patients with HR-MDS not eligible to transplant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
Combination of Onureg and Venetoclax
CHU d'Amiens Picardie - Site sud
Amiens, France
CHU d'Angers
Angers, France
Dose-limiting toxicity
Dose-limiting toxicities according to CTCAE (common terminology criteria for adverses events) 5.0 occurring within the first cycle of treatment
Time frame: at day 28 of cycle 1
Overall response
Overall response measured after the first cycle of treatment according to modified IWG-MDS (International Working Group-Myelodysplastic Syndromes) 2006
Time frame: at day 28 of cycle 1
Best response
Best response evaluated according to the modified IWG-MDS 2006 and IWG-HR-MDS 2023 criteria
Time frame: after 6 cycles of treatment (each cycle is 28 days)
Hematological improvement
Hematological improvement (erythroid, neutrophil and platelet improvement) according to IWG-MDS 2006 and IWG-HR-MDS 2023
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
Time to response
Time from onset of treatment to date of achievement of any response according to the modified IWG-MDS 2006 criteria
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
Duration of response
Time interval between the first date of achievement of any response according to the modified IWG-MDS 2006 criteria to relapse
Time frame: at end of study (an average of 5 years)
Progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Rate of transformation to AML
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, France
Hôpital privé Sévigné
Cesson-Sévigné, France
CH Annecy Genevois
Épagny, France
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, France
CH Le Mans
Le Mans, France
Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
Lille, France
CHU de Limoges - Hôpital Dupuytren
Limoges, France
CH Lyon sud
Lyon, France
...and 15 more locations
Time to next treatment
Time from onset of trial treatment to onset of subsequent therapy
Time frame: at end of study (an average of 5 years)
Survival
Determination of overall survival rate, event-free survival rate, progression-free survival rate
Time frame: at end of study (an average of 5 years)
Transfusion independence
Rate of red blood cells and platelets transfusion independance for transfusion-dependent patients at baseline
Time frame: at end of study (an average of 5 years)
Duration of transfusion independence
Time interval between the achievement of transfusion independence and relapse with need of transfusion
Time frame: at end of study (an average of 5 years)
Identification and grading of adverse events
Toxicity profile of study treatment including identification and grading of adverse events based on NCI CTCAE version 5, cytopenia duration, life-threatening or fatal cytopenias rate, unscheduled hospitalization rate, infectious complications rate, red blood cells and platelets transfusions needs
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
Patient-reported outcomes according to FACIT-AN
Patient-reported outcomes according to Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - anemia (FACIT-An) version 4 (Score range: 0-188), evaluation of of change in QoL from baseline
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
Early mortality
Determination of early mortality rate at day 28
Time frame: at day 28
Patient-reported outcomes according to EQ-5D-5L
Patient-reported outcomes according to 5-level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (Scale numbered from 0 to 100), evaluation of change in QoL from baseline
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
Patient-reported outcomes according to PGIC
Patient-reported outcomes according to Patient global impression of change (PGIC) form, evaluation of change in QoL from baseline
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)
Patient-reported outcomes according to PGIS
Patient-reported outcomes according to Patient global impression of severity (PGIS) form, evaluation of change in QoL from baseline
Time frame: at end of treatment (an average of 4 years)