Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a "polymorphic joint and periarticular pain syndrome associated with various changes in sensitivity, vasomotor, sudomotor, muscular and trophic changes". The diagnostic criteria of the disease follow the Budapest criteria, namely (i) vasomotor disorders (temperature asymmetry, color changes), (ii) sudomotor/oedema (sweating changes, edema), (iii) sensory (hyperesthesia, allodynia, hyperalgesia) and (iv) motor/trophic (reduced joint mobility, weakness, tremor, dystonia, trophic disorders of skin, nails, hair). Of the many treatments, augmented reality mirror therapy (ARMT), is novel in substituting a virtual environment for part of the real environment. This type of device has never been studied from a clinical point of view in the treatment of upper limb CRPS, whereas fMRI and clinical dissertation studies have suggested an improvement in neuroplasticity. The aim of this study is to establish the clinical effects of ARMT on CRPS, and to evaluate its benefit within a conventional rehabilitation treatment (physiotherapy and occupational therapy).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
7
The CT consists of 1 session of 30 minutes of physical therapy (type of re-education established according to the pain at rest and during movement assessed every day) and 1 session of 30 minutes of occupational therapy (type of re-education established according to the pain at rest and during movement assessed every day). CT is performed 5 days a week.
The ARMT consists of 1 session of 30 minutes (type of rehabilitation established according to the pain at rest and during movement evaluated daily). ARMT is performed 5 days a week for 1 month.
An electroencephalogram was taken at the start and end of the study to study cortical reactivity during the performance of 3 different tasks repeated 30 times: a resting task (consisting of looking at a cross on a screen), a motor imagery task (consisting of imagining performing wrist flexions/extensions) and a motor execution task (consisting of performing wrist flexions/extensions).
Motion capture at the start and end of the study to study the fluidity of movement during 3 different tasks repeated 30 times: a resting task (looking at a cross on a screen), a motor imagery task (imagining wrist flexions/extensions) and a motor execution task (performing wrist flexions/extensions).
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
Improvement in upper extremity motor function using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in Box and Block Test (BBT) score. The score will be compared between the right and left hand and against reference values according to age and sex.
Time frame: Every Monday and Thursday until study end (10 weeks)
Improvement in clinical signs of CRPS using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in Complex regional pain syndrome Severity Score (CSS); score out of 16
Time frame: Every Monday and Thursday until study end (10 weeks)
Improvement in quality of life using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in EQ-5D-3L questionnaire score. The first part is a score out of 15 total (scoring out of 3 per item). The second part is a scale numbered 0 to 100 (0 being the worst health imaginable to 100 being the best health imaginable).
Time frame: Every Monday and Thursday until study end (10 weeks)
Improvement in global impression of change using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire score. The measurement is between 1 and 7. It is a qualitative scale converted into a numerical scale.
Time frame: Every Monday and Thursday until study end (10 weeks)
Improvement in deep proprioceptive sensitivity of the upper limb using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in proprioceptive section of the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance questionnaire score. 5 joints are tested 6 times. Thus for each joint, the score is out of 6, for a total score of 30.
Time frame: Every Monday and Thursday until study end (10 weeks)
Improvement of mental imagery ability using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in mental chronometry. Measured using a modified Box and Block Test to give a ratio = (real task time - imagined task time) / real task time
Time frame: Every Monday and Thursday until study end (10 weeks)
Improvement n perceived pain at movement and at rest using ARMT versus CT alone
Change in pain, reported on a 0-10 visual analog scale
Time frame: Daily until study end (10 weeks)
effectiveness of rehabilitation program adding TMRA device on cortical reactivity or Event related Potential (ERP) between pre- and post-treatment on pathological limb
Measurement of signal power amplitude (in microVolts) in motor imagery task and motor execution task compared with a resting task
Time frame: Before Intervention (Day 0) and at the end of the study (10 weeks)
evolution of cortical reactivity or event-related potential (ERP) between the healthy and pathological sides following a rehabilitation program adding a TMRA device.
Amplitude of signal power (in microVolts) in motor imagery task and motor execution task compared with a resting task
Time frame: at the end of the study (10 weeks)
effectiveness of a rehabilitation program adding a TMRA device on smoothness of movement on the pathological limb between pre- and post-treatment
Leap Motion Control motion capture device from Ultraleap Company (description)
Time frame: Before Intervention (Day 0) and at the end of the study (10 weeks)
To compare the smoothness of movement between the healthy and pathological side following a rehabilitation programme adding a TMRA device.
Amplitude of signal power in motor imagery task and motor execution task compared with a resting task (descriptive, adimentional)
Time frame: at the end of the study (10 weeks)
Correlate the power of cortical reactivity with fluidity of movement, function, mental chronometry, quality of life, global impression of change, proprioceptive sensitivity and clinical criteria of severity.
Correlation between 2 signals: cortical and motor for motor execution tasks (adimentional)
Time frame: Before Intervention (Day 0) and at the end of the study (10 weeks)
Correlate fluidity of movement with the power of cortical reactivity, function, mental chronometry, quality of life, global impression of change, proprioceptive sensitivity and clinical criteria of severity.
Multiple correlation (adimentional)
Time frame: Before Intervention (Day 0) and at the end of the study (10 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.