The Impact of Social Phone Calls on Adults Who Have Had a Stroke

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston14 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to see the impact of social visits, through weekly phone calls, on quality of life and health outcomes of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and self-rated health for adults who have experienced an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and to determine the benefit of these conversations on the student volunteer's perspective of adults who have survived a stroke

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Social Phone CallsBEHAVIORAL

Following the collection of baseline data, the study participant will be randomly assigned to a student volunteer to begin the social phone calls. The first phone call will be scheduled to occur within one week of the consent and baseline assessments. A minimum of one social phone call will occur each week for 6weeks. Each phone call is expected to last around 1 hour with flexibility to be shorter or longer. The calls will be unstructured and designed simply to engage in conversation with the participant. The length of the phone calls, days and times will be recorded by the volunteer along with a short journal entry describing the conversation topics and any information that stood out to the volunteer. If the stroke survivor and student volunteer wish to speak more than the designated one call a week, that will be allowed if both parties agree. The same student volunteer will conduct all six sessions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * have a UCLA short form score of 4 or higher * can read, write, and speak English * have had an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke is the past year * have a telephone and are available for weekly phone calls * provide informed consent agreeing to be contacted by the volunteers Exclusion Criteria: * reside outside of the home * have Electronic Health Record documentation of Aphasia * Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of \<9

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who enrolled in the study

Time frame: post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention)

Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who completed all 6 phone calls

Time frame: post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention)

Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who completed all the assessments

Time frame: post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention)

Secondary Outcomes

Change in loneliness as assessed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

This is a 20 item questionnaire, each one is scored form 1(never) to 4(always). Scores for questions 1,5,6,9,10,15,16,19 and 20 are reversed(i.e. 1=4,2=3,3=2,4=1)and the scores for each item is then summed together, higher number indicating more loneliness

Time frame: Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention)

Change in depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

This is a 20 item questionnaire, each item is scored from 0(rarely or none of the time)-3 (most or all of the time) with a possible range of scores from 0-60 a higher score indicating more depression

Time frame: Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention)

Change in anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale (GAD 7)

This is a 7 item questionnaire, each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) a higher number indicating more anxiety

Time frame: Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention)

Change in social support as assessed by the Duke Social Support Index (DSSI) Scale

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.