Finite Versus Continuous Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B

Overview

BACKGROUND: Finite nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy was proposed as an alternative strategy in the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) but there remained not data from randomized controlled trials to clarify safety and efficacy of this treatment strategy. AIMS: The investigators aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finite Nuc therapy versus continuous treatment in CHB patients without liver cirrhosis and also to identify factors that may predict therapeutic responses and clinical outcomes after withdrawal of Nuc treatment for CHB MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in Taiwan. Eligible patients are adults (age≥20 years) with CHB (chronic infection ≥ 6 months) who fulfill the APASL guideline 2016 to stop NA therapy. Those with cirrhosis, malignancy, organ transplant, autoimmune disorder, or serious underlying diseases including renal impairment were excluded. A total of 360 patients will be enrolled. Enrolled patients are randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to continue viral suppression with entecavir (0.5mg once daily) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300mg once daily) or stop the treatment. All patients will be followed up according to the protocol recommended by a panel of APASL experts. The primary analysis for study outcomes is scheduled at 3 years after randomization and the primary outcome is seroclearance of HBsAg. There will be interim analyses scheduled at one- and two-years following randomization of the first 200 patients, and also one-and two years following randomization of the planned 360 patients, to determine whether early termination of the trial may be justified by attainment of the efficacy endpoint (10% vs 1% of HBsAg seroclearance) or concerns of the safety outcomes (significant between-group difference in mortality, acute on chronic liver failure, or acute flares with hepatic decompensation).

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection imposes a serious threat to global public health, affecting more than 250 million individuals around the world. In the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), treatment with nucleos(t)ide analog (Nuc) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes including occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver-related mortality, and overall mortality. Nuc therapy, however, cannot exterminate HBV and so continuous treatment is usually required to sustain viral inhibition. Seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) predicts durable remission off Nuc and may serve as the treatment endpoint, but it rarely occurs with current regimen. Therefore, long-term to indefinite treatment is currently recommended. In view of various concerns such as drug exposure, adherence, and expense for a treatment course that could be lifelong, a finite strategy of Nuc therapy was proposed to allow treatment withdrawal prior to HBsAg seroclearance. Another major reason for the finite strategy is a higher chance of HBsAg seroclearance following treatment cessation. Nevertheless, viral replication almost always reactivates and often leads to clinical flares. While an episode of acute flare might be self-limited or even conducive to HBsAg seroclearance, it could progress to acute on chronic liver failure with fatal consequences. Risks of these serious outcomes following treatment withdrawal need to be accurately quantified in order to inform the practice of finite Nuc therapy. Existent literature on the efficacy and safety of finite Nuc therapy remained very limited, as recently shown in a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hall and colleagues. In order to close the gaps in current knowledge, the investigators conduct this multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine if cessation of Nuc is safe and conducive to HBsAg seroclearance.