This is a randomized, sham-controlled pilot study that will assess the safety and feasibility of splenic focused pulsed ultrasound treatment on burn wound healing time in 24 subjects (12 active ultrasound and 12 sham controls).
The Central Hypothesis underlying this study is that splenic ultrasound stimulation activates the splenic anti-inflammatory pathway, thereby producing reduction in circulating macrophage cytokine production, reduction of neutrophil invasiveness, or induction of phenotypic transition in circulating immune cells (e.g., M1 to M2 transition in macrophages) in patients with partial thickness wounds that cover \<20% body surface area. Approximately 24 subjects will participate in this study. Male and female subjects of all races and ethnicities will be recruited for study from the ethnically diverse patient population of the LAC+USC Burn Center from the surrounding area. Phase 0 Burn wound subjects will be screened and enrolled at the LAC+USC Burn Center located in Los Angeles, California. No other sites, neither regional nor outside of the United States are going to participate in enrollment of subjects. A General Electric LOGIQ E10 ultrasound machine with a C1-6-XD clear probe, will be used to selectively deliver pulsed ultrasound to the spleen. 12 months. 28 days or until healed (whichever comes first)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
8
A General Electric LOGIQ E10 ultrasound machine with a C1-6-XD clear probe, will be used to selectively deliver pulsed ultrasound to the spleen.
A General Electric LOGIQ E10 ultrasound probe will be placed over the spleen with no energy applied
LAC+USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Incidence and severity of adverse device effects (ADEs)
Review of anticipated device effects after splenic ultrasound insonification in subjects with partial thickness wounds that cover \<20% body surface area.
Time frame: Days 1 -28
Median time to re-epithelialization using advanced digital imaging
Re-epithelialization measured by digital planimetry
Time frame: 28 days or until healed (whichever comes first)
Difference in groups in pain measured visual analog scale, (VAS)
Pain, scale 0-10 with 10 being worst outcome
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28
Difference in groups in itch measured visual analog scale, (VAS)
Itch, scale 0-10 with 10 being worst outcome
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28
Difference in groups in non-invasive perfusion measured visual analog scale, (VAS)
Doppler perfusion, scale 0-10 with 10 being worst outcome
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28
Referral to scar management specialist
Scar management
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28
Scar assessments using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
A 5 point score ranging from 1 (normal pigmentation, no itching) to 5 (worst imaginable scar or sensation).
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28
Multiplexed analysis of plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines, lab range values
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28
Flow cytometry analysis of phenotype of macrophage, neutrophil, and T lymphocyte populations
Phenotype of macrophage, neutrophil, and T lymphocyte, lab range values
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21 and 28