The aim of the study is to find out whether supervised physical exercise during cancer drug treatment improves the effectiveness of the treatment in metastasized breast, kidney, ovarian and prostate cancer compared to unsupervised exercise. In addition, the investigators are investigating whether the use of atorvastatin combined with guided group exercise training would further improve the response to cancer treatment.
Despite the marked differences between different malignancies' genetic, metabolic, and prognostic factors, hypoxia and adaptation of metabolic changes favoring hypoxic microenvironment are common factors in most solid tumors. Hypoxic microenvironment provides cancer cells multiple advantages: protection from immune system, somatic mutations leading to more aggressive form of cancer, and cancer cells that are adjusted to hypoxic conditions are more prone to form metastases. One possible mechanism for cancer cell to adjust to hypoxic microenvironment is related to lipid metabolism; lipids are known to accumulate into cancer cells in many cancer types. One of the most promising ways to reduce hypoxia in solid tumors is to increase physical exercise. Furthermore, tumors' lipid metabolism can be affected by treatment with cholesterol-lowering statins, which decreases serum cholesterol levels and inhibits cancer cells' own lipid synthesis. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate if supervised group exercise will improve response to cancer drug treatment in metastasized breast, kidney, prostate, and ovarian cancer compared to unsupervised exercise. The investigators will also evaluate if atorvastatin treatment in combination with guided group exercise can promote even better treatment responses than exercise alone. Exercise program includes aerobic and resistance training. This study is a randomized phase III study testing the research hypothesis for the first time in humans. A total of 240 cancer patients (n=60/cancer type) will be recruited into the study and randomized 1:1:1 into three different groups, i.e. 20 people in each group from each cancer type: 1. 3 months of supervised group exercise 2. 3 months of supervised group exercise and at the same time atorvastatin 40 mg/day 3. to a control group that exercises voluntarily without guidance. In addition, as a separate group, a total of 160 cancer patients (40/cancer type) who are already using statin medication will be recruited for the study and randomized 1:1 into two groups: 1) 3 months of supervised group exercise and 2) independent exercise (a control group that exercises voluntarily without guidance). Before the study begins, the patients are informed orally and in writing about the study. The patients who agree to participate in the study sign an informed consent. The patient follow-up time in each group is two years in 3 months intervals (first visit and 8 follow-up visits) in conjunction with standard cancer treatment follow-up visits. Blood and urine samples and questionnaire data are collected at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Body composition and physical performance are measured at baseline and twice after the intervention. Patients QoL and experiences of exercise are measured in qualitative interviews (in the group participating the qualitative sub-study). The main response variables are 1. cancer progression during cancer treatment based on imaging, symptoms or laboratory findings and 2. mortality of the patients. The other variables of interest in this study are: 3. Hypoxia markers 4. Tolerability of treatment 5. Body composition 6. Physical performance 7. The extent of hypoxia, as measured by PET scans, in participants of the sub-study 4\) Quality of life, perceived pain, depressive symptoms, nutrition and relationships. Adverse events from cancer treatment and treatment interruptions are also monitored.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
240
Patients will be participating in guided physical exercise program regularly two times / week at a sports facility and guided by a professional trainer. They will participate in aerobic and resistance exercises during the sessions.
Patients will be participating in guided physical exercise program regularly two times / week at a sports facility and guided by a professional trainer. They will participate in aerobic and resistance exercises during the sessions. In addition to the exercise program they will be given atorvastatin 40 mg QD medication.
The control group is advised of the benefits of physical exercise and they get an exercise program to follow. Participants in the control group exercise on their own.
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, Länsi-Suomi, Finland
RECRUITINGTime to cancer progression
Radiological progression • Radiological progression of the disease according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1.) compared to the situation at the start of cancer treatment in all cancer types. If the cancer treatment includes the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the imRECIST criteria are applied to evaluate the response In addition, the disease is considered advanced if both of the criteria below are met: * Biochemical progression: * PSA progression in prostate cancer, (three consecutive PSA increases measured at least one week apart, two \> 50% increases from the lowest PSA level and PSA \> 2 ng/ml) with testosterone at castration level (\< 50 ng/ml or 1.7 nmol/l) * Ca15-3 marker increase in breast cancer (three consecutive marker increases that the clinician considers significant) * In ovarian cancer, ca12-5 marker increase (three consecutive marker increases that the clinician considers significant) * Clinical progression o ECOG 3 or less (long-term)
Time frame: From randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed at twelve week intervals up to 24 months
Mortality
Time to death from the beginning of the first-line medication
Time frame: From randomization until the date of death, assessed up to 24 months
Hypoxia markers in serum (VEGF, HIF1-alpha, carboanhydrase IX, LADH)
Hypoxia markers in the serum
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months
Tolerability of treatment
Incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events during cancer treatment
Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed at twelve week intervals up to 24 months
Fat/muscle ratio as measured with impedance test
Body composition measurement before and after the intervention
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 and 6 months
Physical performance with standardized muscle strength tests
Muscle strength tested with three standardized tests (squat test, core dynamic strength test, biceps flexion test) before and after the intervention.
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 and 6 months
Changes in tissue hypoxia
The amount of hypoxia in cancer foci determined by PET-CT scan using specific hypoxia-sensitive tracers in a sub-study
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months
Changes in quality of life
EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire to measure quality of life, score from 0 to 100. A high scale score for a functional scale represents a higher level of functioning, a high score for a symptom scale represents higher level of symptoms.
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 months
Depressive symptoms
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), score from 0 (no depression) to 27 (severe depression).
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 months
Severity of pain
The severity of pain and its impact on functioning. Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire including 9 items. Pain severity scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), pain interference from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 months
Nutritional status
Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire. A score of 7 or less (malnutrition) to 24-30 (normal nutrition).
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 months
Relationship satisfaction
The relationship questionnaire consists of two previously used, validated measures: Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and Marital Communication Inventory.
Time frame: At baseline and at three months, twelve months and 24 moths.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.