This study is a double-blind comparative study examining the curative effect and mechanism of the transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation treatment on non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease patients. The investigators hypothesize that treatment using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation will improve the non-motor symptoms, such as improving sleep, and improve cortical activity simultaneously in Parkinson's disease patients.
Patients in the Experimental group underwent fourteen consecutive daily sessions of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS, twice daily, 30 minutes each time), whereas patients in the sham stimulation group underwent fourteen consecutive daily sessions of sham taVNS. Assessments of motor and non-motor symptoms, cortical activity (using Functional near-infrared spectroscopy) and blood indicators were performed three times: at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation was conducted by transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy instrument to the cymba conchae of left ear in the vicinity of the auricular branch vagus nerve. Stimulation parameters: frequency = 20/4 Hz; pulse width = 200 μs, twice a day, 30 minutes each time.
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation was conducted by transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy instrument to the left earlobe. Stimulation parameters: frequency = 20/4 Hz; pulse width = 200 μs, twice a day, 30 minutes each time.
the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Changes in sleep quality, sleep efficiency of patients
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) was used to evaluate the sleep quality of participants in the past month. It consists of 19 self-evaluation and 5 other evaluation items. The total score range is 0-21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post intervention.
The motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
The measure mainly reflects the overall severity of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms. The minimum and maximum values of the motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale are 0 and 108. A higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post intervention.
Changes of sleep quality scale
Non-motor symptoms such as sleep disorders were evaluated by Parkinson's disease sleep scale-2 (PDSS-2). PDSS-2 is an improved version of PDSS used to screen for common types of sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease patients. The minimum and maximum values of the non-motor part of the PDSS-2 Scale are 0 and 60. A higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post intervention.
Changes of Rapid-eye-movement Sleep Behavior Disorder scale
Rapid-eye-movement Sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ) was used to assess the behavior disorder of multiple eye movement sleep. The minimum and maximum values of the non-motor part of the RBDSQ Scale are 0 and 13. A higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post intervention.
Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS)
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale, also known as the Epworth Daytime Sleepiness Scale, was developed by Johns MW to assess excessive daytime sleepiness. This scale has clinical significance: it can provide a semi-objective assessment of sleepiness. Scoring more than 6 out of 24 indicates drowsiness, more than 11 indicates excessive sleepiness, and more than 16 indicates dangerous sleepiness.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24)
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is the most widely used instrument for clinical assessment of depressive states, effectively reflecting the severity of the condition. The total score ranges from 0 to 76 points, with lower scores indicating milder symptoms and higher scores signifying more severe conditions.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA)
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale is commonly used in clinical practice as a basis for diagnosing anxiety disorders and assessing their severity. The total score can be used to evaluate the severity of anxiety symptoms in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders, as well as to assess the effects of various pharmacological and psychological interventions. According to data provided by the Chinese Scale Collaborative Group: a total score ≥29 indicates possible severe anxiety; ≥21 confirms significant anxiety; ≥14 confirms the presence of anxiety; \>7 suggests possible anxiety; and a score \<7 indicates no anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is an evaluation tool used for rapid screening of patients with mild cognitive impairment. The assessed cognitive domains include attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, visuospatial skills, abstract thinking, as well as calculation and orientation. The total score of the scale is 30 points, with test results indicating a normal value of ≥26 points.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Changes in ΔHbO2 concentration in the brain cortex
The ΔHbO2 concentration in the brain cortex will be recorded in oxyhemoglobin.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Plasma indicators
5ml of the patient's elbow vein blood was collected and centrifuged after standing and stratified. The blood plasma was collected and frozen at - 20 ℃ for testing. Detection of changes in plasma ghrelin levels.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post intervention.
Subjective sleep assessment
Using sleep logs to record participants' subjective sleep data, including subjective sleep quality scores,early morning refreshment scores, easy wake up scores, ease of falling asleep scores, and dreaming scores.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post
Objective sleep assessment
Using MI wristbands for objective sleep assessment, including deep sleep time scores,night waking up times, light sleep duration, and the REM sleep duration.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, fourteen days post