Aspiration pneumonia is a common complication in senior patients with high morbidity and mortality rate. The decline of physical function among elders can easily lead to swallowing disorders, and nasogastric (NG) tube insertion is an emergency medical treatment that provides patients with adequate hydration and nutrition. However, NG is easily dislodged after a long duration of placement; furthermore, lacking accurate feeding skills could also lead to aspiration pneumonia.
Aspiration pneumonia is a common complication in senior patients with high morbidity and mortality rate. The decline of physical function among elders can easily lead to swallowing disorders, and nasogastric (NG) tube insertion is an emergency medical treatment that provides patients with adequate hydration and nutrition. However, NG is easily dislodged after a long duration of placement; furthermore, lacking accurate feeding skills could also lead to aspiration pneumonia. An appropriate NG care model to lower feeding complications is an essential issue. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of eating rehabilitation training in the removal of NG tubes among elderly patients with aspiration pneumonia. This is an experimental, convenient sampling study. We enrolled first-time NG tube insertion friends and complicated with aspiration pneumonia. All patients in this study were from the medical ward of a tertiary center in northern Taiwan. The target numbers are ninety-six patients. The eligible subjects will be randomized to the experimental and the control group. The experimental group will receive eating rehabilitation training, including oral care, saliva gland massage, oral exercise, feeding strategy, and swallowing skill education. The control group will receive routine medical care. The endpoint of this study includes 1. The timing of NG removal, 2. The re-insertion rate after one month of NG removal, 3. 30 days unexpected re-admission rate. The characteristics and distribution of variables were described by percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the difference between-group differences on the 30 days of NG re-insertion and re-admission rate. The timing of NG removal between the two groups was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival. All statistical analyses were performed on Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. This study's results provide caregivers with more successful strategy for removing senior aspiration pneumonia patients' nasogastric tubes and improving early oral intake and patients' quality of life.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
The experimental group will receive eating rehabilitation training, including oral care, saliva gland massage, oral exercise, feeding strategy, and swallowing skill education.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
RECRUITINGnasogastric tube successfully removed and spent of time with removed successfully nasogastric tube
It was observed from the bedside that the subjects had successfully removed the nasogastric tube according to the doctor's advice before being discharged from the hospital. The criteria for successfully removing the nasogastric tube in the ward include: the research subject can accept oral medication, can eat about 1000ml per day, and has no cough when eating. In addition to the above circumstances, when removing the nasogastric tube, the doctor's confirmation and removal of the doctor's order are also required
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from the cause, assessed up to one month.
The re-insertion rate after one month of NG removal
Subjects whose nasogastric tube was removed during hospitalization were followed up at the bedside or by telephone once a week after the removal of the nasogastric tube to find out whether there was any unexpected nasogastric tube re-insertion within 30 days after the removal of the nasogastric tube.
Time frame: From the date of discharge from any cause, assessed up to one month.
Ling Yi Tai
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
96