Aims: Evaluation of treatment success on HSPM-affected molars after ART and Hall technique. comparison of pain during treatment with ART and Hall technique in HSPM. comparison of child and parent satisfaction with restorations used by ART and Hall technique. Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover clinical study including thirty children.
Background and Aims: Despite the widespread prevalence of HSPM: there are no comparative studies yet between ART and Hall technique in the restoration of HSPM. there are no studies yet on the success of ART in the treatment of HSPM. Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover clinical study including thirty children Each child will apply both of ART and Hall technique to him.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
31
The child will be placed to them SSC on one of their HSPM affected teeth. Pain during treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and satisfaction the child and parent will be evaluated using likert scale after the treatment immediately and after one month and evaluate the success restoration adapted from Innes et al. after 3\_6\_9\_12 month.
The child will be restored to them one of their HSPM affected teeth by GIC. Pain during treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and satisfaction the child and parent will be evaluated using likert scale after the treatment immediately and after one month and evaluate the success restoration adapted from Innes et al. after 3\_6\_9\_12 month.
Tishreen University
Latakia, Syria
RECRUITINGDental pain assessed by FLACC scale
Evaluated by outcome assessor using the faces, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral rating scale (FLACC scale) a behavioral pain assessment scale which has five criteria face, legs, activity, cry, consolability, which are each assigned a score of 0,1 or2. Total score of scale is summed in range 0 to10, where:0=relaxed and comfortable; 1-3=mild discomfort; 4-6=moderate pain; 7-10=severe pain.
Time frame: During the placement of the restoration
Child Satisfaction with the restoration assessed by the Likert scale
Self-assessment by the children using Likert scale which is a psychometric scale has five responses (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
Time frame: Immediately after the placement of the restoration
Parent Satisfaction with the restoration assessed by the Likert scale
Self-assessment by the parent using Likert scale which is a psychometric scale has five responses (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
Time frame: Immediately after the placement of the restoration after asking the child
Child Satisfaction with the restoration assessed by the Likert scale
Self-assessment by the children using Likert scale which is a psychometric scale has five responses (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
Time frame: After one month from treatment
Parent Satisfaction with the restoration assessed by the Likert scale
Self-assessment by the parent using Likert scale which is a psychometric scale has a five responses (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
Time frame: After one month from treatment after asking the child
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.