In individuals with obesity, the optimal dosing and duration of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in settings representing acute medical illness or surgery is limited due to lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing specifically on this population. Evidence suggests that in obese participants, both higher dosing and duration of VTE prophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) may be required to achieve a therapeutic effect similar to non-obese participants. This non-interventional study utilizes data already collected from a usual clinical practice setting in the Optum US clinical database, representing obese participants hospitalized with an acute medical condition or undergoing surgery receiving enoxaparin prophylaxis. Its aim is to compare the impact of the following enoxaparin prophylaxis strategies on the incidence of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding in the overall study population and prespecified subgroups: * High versus conventional dose * Extended versus conventional duration * Combined High-Dose and Extended-Duration versus Conventional-Dose and Conventional-Duration. The first date of enoxaparin prophylaxis will be the index date.
The study period will be from February 2010 to September 2021. Participants will be followed for 90 days.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
21,000
Sanofi U.S.
Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
Change in the incidence of symptomatic VTE, from index date to Day 90
The VTE endpoint is intended to represent a new onset symptomatic VTE event. It will be identified in the proposed database by utilizing an algorithm based on the International Classification of Disease 10th and 9th revisions (ICD-10 and ICD-9) codes.
Time frame: Retrospective data analysis from February, 2010 to September, 2021, with this endpoint evaluated up to 90 days after the individual participant's index date.
Change in the incidence of major bleeding, from index date to Day 90
The major bleeding event will be identified via an algorithm based on the International Classification of Disease-10th revision and 9th revision (ICD-10 and ICD-9) codes.
Time frame: Retrospective data analysis from February, 2010 to September, 2021, with this endpoint evaluated up to 90 days after the individual participant's index date.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.