The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of NFS-02 in the treatment of LHON caused by mitochondrial ND1 gene mutation. This study will enroll subjects aged ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 75 years old to receive a single unilateral intravitreal (IVT) injection of NFS-02 to evaluate its safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy. The clinical manifestations of all subjects are to be reduced visual acuity caused by LHON associated with ND1 mutation, with laboratory test showing G3460A mutation (a CLIA-certified laboratory) and reduced visual acuity lasted for \> 6 months and \< 10 years.
At the dose-finding stage, the principle is that the Safety Review Committee (SRC) will decide whether to make dose adjustment based on the safety data of the starting dose. The starting dose is 1.5×108 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose. The safety of the starting dose will be reviewed by the SRC, and dose escalation or de-escalation is by recommendation of the SRC. The safety of the starting dose will first be performed in 6 evaluable subjects. Criteria for Dose Modification: Dose Escalation: If drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events are observed in \< 2 of the 6 evaluable subjects within 6 weeks after the dosing of NFS-02 at the starting dose, the dose can be escalated to 5.0×108 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose after the approval by SRC. If drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events are observed in \< 2 of the 6 evaluable subjects within 6 weeks after the dosing of NFS-02 at the 5.0×108 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose, the dose can be escalated to 1.5×109 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose after the approval by SRC. Dose De-escalation: If drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events are observed in ≥ 2 of the 6 evaluable subjects within 6 weeks after the dosing of NFS-02 at the starting dose, the dose can be de-escalated to 5.0×107 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose after the approval by SRC. Enrollment Sequence: * The enrollment sequence of any dose group (6 subjects) is that the 2nd subject and the 3rd subject will be enrolled at least 7 days after the enrollment of the 1st subject. * The 4th, 5th and 6th subjects will be enrolled at least 7 days after the enrollment of the 2nd and the 3rd subjects. The 7-day interval is to avoid acute safety events to the greatest possible extent.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
11
The starting dose is 1.5×108 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose. If drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events are observed in \< 2 of the 6 evaluable subjects within 6 weeks after the dosing of NFS-02 at the starting dose, the dose can be escalated to 5.0×108 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose after the approval by SRC. If drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events are observed in \< 2 of the 6 evaluable subjects within 6 weeks after the dosing of NFS-02 at the 5.0×108 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose, the dose can be escalated to 1.5×109 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose after the approval by SRC. If drug-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events are observed in ≥ 2 of the 6 evaluable subjects within 6 weeks after the dosing of NFS-02 at the starting dose, the dose can be de-escalated to 5.0×107 vg, 0.05 mL eye/dose after the approval by SRC.
University of Colorado- Dept of Ophthalmology
Aurora, Colorado, United States
The First Medical Center of the General Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Optometry Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) within 52 weeks of NFS-02 intravitreal injection at different doses
Time frame: 52 weeks
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)within 52 weeks of NFS-02 intravitreal injection at different doses
Time frame: 52 weeks
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) (ocular and non-ocular) within 52 weeks of NFS-02 intravitreal injection at different doses
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion (%) of subjects with an improvement of ≥ 0.3 LogMAR from baseline in BCVA in the injected eye and non-injected eye
ETDRS visual acuity charts will used to assess proportion (percent) of subjects with an improvement of ≥ 0.3 LogMAR from baseline in Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
Mean change from baseline in BCVA (LogMAR) in the injected eye and non-injected eye
ETDRS visual acuity charts will used to assess mean change from baseline in BCVA (LogMAR)
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
Mean change in BCVA (LogMAR) compared to nadir in the injected eye and non-injected eye
ETDRS visual acuity charts will used to assess mean change in BCVA (LogMAR) compared to nadir
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
Change from baseline in the parameter of microperimetry in the injected eye and non-injected eye
Microperimetry parameters will evaluate alterations in function of different region the retina. The major parameter to be documented is mean sensitivity
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
Proportion (%) of subjects with a clinically meaningful improvement of injected eye from baseline in microperimetry in the injected eye and non-injected eye
Microperimetry parameters will evaluate alterations in function of different region the retina. The major parameter to be documented is mean sensitivity. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as an improvement of 7 decibels (dB) or more post-treatment from a baseline in a pre-defined area consisting of 5 or more points in central 20° vision on microperimetry (a pre-defined area is set as central 36 loci among 68 loci of the whole grid)
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
Change from baseline in contrast sensitivity in the injected eye and non-injected eye
The contrast sensitivity examination measures the subject's ability to discern targets presented at varying spatial frequencies or sizes under different contrast levels. The contrast sensitivity examination measures the full range of visual sensitivity, including brightness and contrast, and it may be used as a comprehensive assessment of visual function
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
Change from baseline in visual evoked potential (VEP) parameters in the injected eye and non-injected eye
VEP is a visual electrophysiological examination used to identify possible ischemic optic neuropathy, including the P100 Latency,P100 Amplitude,P2 Latency,P2 Amplitude
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 40, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234, and 260
To evaluate immunogenicity
A central laboratory will be used to evaluate anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibodies in the serum samples of all subjects. These samples will be tested by the sponsor or its designee to detect anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibodies in the samples and report the titer of confirmed positive samples. Samples confirmed positive for anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibodies will also be evaluated for the presence of neutralizing antibodies
Time frame: At Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 26, 40, and 52
To evaluate immunogenicity
The interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay will be performed to measure the proliferative response of lymphocytes to AAV2 antigen and ND1 peptide. The number of activated cells in the sample was calculated
Time frame: At Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 26, 40, and 52
To evaluate vector shedding
Assessment of vector DNA shedding in tears (both eyes).Samples were analyzed to determine the presence of viral DNA in tears
Time frame: At Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 26, 40, and 52
To evaluate biodistribution
Assessment of biodistribution in whole blood. Samples were analyzed to determine the presence of viral DNA in whole blood
Time frame: At Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 26, 40, and 52
To evaluate the improvement in BCVA in the injected eye and non-injected eye (< 0.3 LogMAR)
ETDRS visual acuity charts will used to assess proportion (percent) of subjects with an improvement of ≥ 0.2 LogMAR and ≥ 0.1 LogMAR from baseline in BCVA Proportion (percent) of subjects with visual acuity of \> 1.0 LogMAR before and after treatment
Time frame: At Weeks 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234 and 260
Change from baseline in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the injected eye and non-injected eye
OCT is an imaging technology to investigate the ocular fundus by using of the basic principle of low-coherence light interferometry. It detects the reflection or diffusion signals of biological tissue layers of different depths by inputting low coherence light and obtains the images and quantitative results of the microscopic structure of the retina
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234 and 260
Change from baseline in retinal ganglion cell complex thickness in the injected eye and non-injected eye
OCT is an imaging technology to investigate the ocular fundus by using of the basic principle of low-coherence light interferometry. It detects the reflection or diffusion signals of biological tissue layers of different depths by inputting low coherence light and obtains the images and quantitative results of the microscopic structure of the retina
Time frame: At Weeks 2, 6,12, 26, 52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234 and 260
To evaluate the change from baseline in VFQ-25
VFQ-25 is a 25-item short form version of the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), which can effectively measure patient-reported outcomes (including quality of life, QoL). All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively.
Time frame: At Weeks 12, 26,52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234 and 260
To evaluate the change from baseline in quality of SF-36
The SF-36 questionnaire is a universal tool for evaluating patient-reported QoL outcome. SF-36 comprises 36 questions which cover eight domains of health: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2)limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6)limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The scale score of each domain will be calculated based on the total score of the items included in the said domain and re-adjusted to 0-100,higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: At Weeks 12, 26,52, 78, 104, 130, 156, 182, 208, 234 and 260
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.