This study seeks to improve clinical outcomes for an important, growing, and vulnerable population-nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias-by testing an evidence-based intervention to improve these residents' sleep. It will also examine the implementation and sustainment of this intervention.
Disturbed sleep places older adults at higher risk for frailty, morbidity, and even mortality. Yet nursing home (NH) routines frequently disturb residents' sleep through use of noise and light or efforts, for example, to reduce incontinence. NH residents with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias-almost two-thirds of long-stay NH residents-are likely to be particularly affected by sleep disturbance. This study tackles these important issues and substantially moves forward goals of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease 2018 Update by proposing to implement an evidence-based intervention to improve sleep: a NH frontline staff huddling program known as LOCK. The LOCK program is derived from evidence supporting strengths-based learning, systematic observation, relationship-based teamwork, and efficiency. This is an incomplete stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial to test the impact and sustainability of the LOCK sleep program. In 24 community nursing homes (NHs)-eight from each of 3 national NH corporations-our multi-disciplinary team will examine these aims: (1) Implement the LOCK-based sleep program for residents with ADRD using the train-the-trainer model. (2) Estimate impact of the LOCK sleep program on sleep (primary outcome) and on psychotropic medication use, pain and analgesic medication use, and activities of daily living decline (secondary outcomes). (3) Examine factors, using mixed methods, associated with variation in the program's implementation and its sustainability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
456
The LOCK sleep program is a program that trains NH staff in a NH frontline staff huddling approach. It is derived from evidence supporting strengths-based learning, systematic observation, relationship-based teamwork, and efficiency. Staff learn how to work together as a team to collaboratively problem-solving about resident sleep challenges (e.g., evidence-based sleep promoting best practices and daytime meaningful activity best practices).
Each NH serves as its own control. During the control period, baseline data will be collected.
Vivage/Beecan Corporation
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
RECRUITINGNational HealthCare Corporation
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States
RECRUITINGCaraday Healthcare, LLC
San Marcos, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGSleep (actigraph measurement)
Total sleep time (total minutes asleep each nighttime period - 10pm to 7am)
Time frame: 15 week sleep intervention period
Psychotropic medication use
As recorded in the Minimum Data Set's Medications received subscale, Antipsychotic medication question, and Psychotropic Drug Care Area Trigger Code. The Medications received subscale asks if the resident has received any antipsychotic, antianxiety or antidepressant medication in the past seven days or since admission/reentry if less than seven days. The Antipsychotic medication, similar to in the previous subscale, asks whether the resident received antipsychotic medications since admission/entry or reentry or the prior OBRA assessment, whichever is more recent. Finally, the Psychotropic Drug Trigger Code asks whether the Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area was triggered. These are MDS items N0410A-C, N0450A, and V0200A17A, respectively. These data will be consolidated into a trichotomous indicator of change from baseline (decrease, increase, same).
Time frame: 15 week sleep intervention period
Pain treatment received
Based on the Pain Management items as recorded in the Minimum Data Set. The Pain Management sub scale asks, using yes or no questions, if the resident has been on a scheduled pain medication regimen, received PRN pain medication or was offered and declined, and, has received non-medication intervention for pain in the past five days. These data will be consolidated into a trichotomous indicator of change from baseline (decrease, increase, same).
Time frame: 15 week sleep intervention period
Pain - Resident Report
Based on the Pain Assessment items as recorded in the Minimum Data Set. The Pain Assessment sub scale asks if the resident has had pain or hurting (yes, no), the frequency of pain or hurting (almost constantly, frequently, occasionally, rarely), if the resident had difficulty sleeping because of pain or hurting (yes, no), if the residents day-to-day activities were limited because of pain or hurting (yes, no) over the past five days. The Pain Intensity sub scale asks the residents numeric pain rating value (0-10 scale) and intensity of worst pain experienced (mild, moderate, severe, very severe or horrible) in the past five days. These data will be consolidated into a trichotomous indicator of change from baseline (decrease, increase, same).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 15 week sleep intervention period
Pain - Staff Report
As recorded in the Minimum Data Set, the Staff Assessment sub scale asks staff members, all yes, no responses, if the resident had non-verbal sounds, verbal complaints, facial expressions, protective body movements or postures, or no signs that may be an indicator of possible pain in the last five days. These data will be consolidated into a trichotomous indicator of change from baseline (decrease, increase, same).
Time frame: 15 week sleep intervention period
Activities of daily living decline
Has activities of daily living functional ability declined from baseline. Based on Minimum Data Set items assessing decline in activities of daily living (MDS; G0110A-J \& G0120A-B; QM N028.01), these data will be consolidated into a trichotomous indicator of change from baseline (decrease, increase, same)
Time frame: 15 week sleep intervention period