The purpose of this study is to verify the safety and efficacy of the Vascular Closure Device (Tonbridge) in hemostasis treatment for femoral artery puncture.
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized control, non-inferiority clinical trial carried out in 7 centers throughout China. 228 subjects with hemostasis of femoral artery puncture will be treated with the Vascular Closure Device (Tonbridge) or the EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device (Codis Corporation). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the vascular closure device in hemostasis treatment for femoral artery puncture.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
228
Hemostasis treatment for femoral artery puncture with Vascular Closure Device (Tonbridge).
Hemostasis treatment for femoral artery puncture with EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device (Codis Corporation).
The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College
Wuhu, Anhui, China
Nanyang Central Hospital
Nanyang, Henan, China
Puyang Oilfield General Hospital
Puyang, Henan, China
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Immediate hemostasis success rate
Immediate hemostasis success is defined as no significant blood oozing and no visible or palpable expanding or developing hematoma on femoral artery puncture site within 5 minutes, once completing the closure operation of femoral artery puncture site using vascular closure device.
Time frame: intra-procedure
Time to hemostasis
The time it takes (unit: minute) to reach no significant blood oozing and no visible or palpable expanding or developing hematoma on femoral artery puncture site, once completing the closure operation of femoral artery puncture site using vascular closure device.
Time frame: intra-procedure
Incidence of complications associated with femoral artery access
"Incidence of complications associated with femoral artery access" is the proportion of subjects with femoral artery access complications using the investigational device or the comparator.
Time frame: 30±7 days post-procedure
Incidence of device deficiency
Device deficiency is the unreasonable risk that may endanger human health and life safety under normal use of medical devices during clinical trials, such as labeling errors, quality problems and malfunctions, etc.
Time frame: intra-procedure
Incidence of adverse events (AE)
"Incidence of adverse events" is the proportion of subjects with adverse events using the investigational device or the comparator.
Time frame: 30±7 days post-procedure
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAE)
"Incidence of serious adverse events" is the proportion of subjects with serious adverse events using the investigational device or the comparator.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
General Hospital of Northern Theater Command
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Time frame: 30±7 days post-procedure