A study to evaluate safety and activity in treatment of IgAN patients using Rituximab in combination with RASi(ACEI and/or ARB) compared with RASi.
IgA nephropathy (IgAN, IgA nephropathy), is currently the most common glomerular disease worldwide, which is characterized by High population quantity, wide distribution, strong heterogeneity. Diagnosis of Urinary protein control level within 1 year is one of the important predictors of renal failure in IgAN patients.Previous studies have shown that patients with renal insufficiency, hypertension, or urinary protein \> 1g at 24h during renal biopsy, and those with poor urinary protein control within 1 year of follow-up, have a higher risk of disease progression, and more than 30-50% of patients will develop into end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within 10 years. The recommended treatments for IgAN in the KDIGO guidelines include: RASi, glucocorticoid, immunosuppressor, antiplatelet drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, etc. Several trials have demonstrated the benefit of RASi in retarding disease progression in IgAN patients with proteinuria, but there is currently no specific treatment for IgAN. In recent years, it has been found that excessive production of Galactos-deficient IgA1 is one of the initiating factors of the pathogenesis of IgAN. Infection by pathogenic microorganisms induces lymphocytes in IgAN patients to produce anti-GD-IgA1 autoantibodies (second strike), which forms circulating immune complexes to deposit in the kidney and activates complement, which is an important pathogenesis of IgAN.However, recent studies have suggested that B-cell depletion therapy is effective for many aabs mediated renal diseases (e.g., membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, etc.). Rituximab, which combined with CD20 antigen on the B cell surface, can deplete B cells and play a therapeutic role by reducing antibody production. Therefore, the treatment of rituximab has potential therapeutic value for IgAN patients as well. However, there were very few studies which have shown the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of IgA nephropathy, only groups reported abroad, and the results were inconsistent. At present, there have been no randomized controlled studies to verify the safety and efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of IgA nephropathy, especially in Chinese with high incidence of IgAN. In this study, treatment of rituximab combining with RASi will be compared with RASi for IgAN patients, to explore an effective and safer regimen for IgAN, so as to bring more hope to patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
116
Rituximab is a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody specifically targeting B cell surface antigen CD20. CD20 may act as a calcium channel to play a certain signal role and participate in the regulation of B cell maturation and differentiation. Once combined with CD20, RTX consumed CD20 + B fines through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and direct induction of apoptosis. Recent studies have shown that B cell depletion therapy has a certain effect on many autoantibodies-mediated kidney diseases ( such as membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, etc. ). Therefore, rituximab combined with CD20 antigen on the surface of B cells can exhaust B cells that produce antibodies and play a therapeutic role by reducing antibody production, so this therapy also has potential therapeutic value for IgAN patients.
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Changes in proteinuria levels over 1 year compared with baseline
changes in proteinuria levels over 1 year compared with baseline
Time frame: 1 year
The proportion of 50% reduction in mean urinary protein compared with baseline over 1 year
Statistical data of proportion of 50% reduction in mean urinary protein compared with baseline over 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
The proportion of 50% reduction in mean urinary protein compared with baseline over 6 months
Statistical data of proportion of 50% reduction in mean urinary protein compared with baseline over 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in proteinuria levels over 6 months compared with baseline
Changes in proteinuria levels over 6 months compared with baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in eGFR levels over 1 year compared with baseline
changes in eGFR levels over 1 year compared with baseline
Time frame: 1 year
Changes of Gd-IgA1 levels
Changes of Gd-IgA1 levels
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of ESRD
Incidence of ESRD
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Proportion of eGFR decreased by 50 % or serum creatine doubled compared with baseline
Proportion of eGFR decreased by 50 % or serum creatinine doubled compared with baseline
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence rate of infection
Incidence rate of infection
Time frame: 1 year