The STABLE-VT trial aims to determine the safety profile and clinical efficacy of a modified approach to ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation that integrates myocardial scar as visualized on cardiac magnetic resonance (c-MRI) or CT into electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for VT ablation.
The STABLE-VT trial aims to integrate myocardial scar as visualized on cardiac magnetic resonance (c-MRI) or CT into electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for VT ablation. Particularly, we will compare the procedural safety, and acute and long-term clinical efficacy of this imaging-aided VT ablation protocol to standard of care. Our hypothesis is that patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and severe LV dysfunction randomized to this imaging-aided protocol will have shorter procedure duration, improved procedural hemodynamic stability, fewer acute major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), less need for mechanical support, comparable freedom from VT at noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) sub-acutely after the procedure, and at two-year follow-up compared to standard ablation approach. Herein, our outcomes of interest will be captured during the two years following as part of regular standard of care follow-ups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
CT and/or c-MRI derived myocardial scar will be merged with 3D electroanatomical mapping (EAM) prior to the ablation to allow for readily localization and characterization of VT substrates and potential re-entry circuits to be ablated. This is done with the intent to limit the repeated number of inductions and prolonged point-by-point voltage mapping that often result in hemodynamic instability.
Hospital of The University Of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Incidence of major adverse cardiac events, which are cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA
Time frame: during hospital stay following ablation procedure, up to 1 week
Number of Participants Requiring Mechanical circulatory support use
Incidence of mechanical circulatory support (e.g., extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, LVAD or transplant) use
Time frame: During the procedure, 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure
Number of Participants Requiring Inotropic support use
Incidence of inotropic and vasoactive agents use
Time frame: During the procedure, 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pericardial Effusion
Assessing clinically significant pericardial effusion causing hemodynamic instability
Time frame: During the procedure, up to 24 hours after the ablation procedure
Number of Participants With Acute kidney injury
Acute kidney injury (≥50% within 48 hours of the start of the procedure)
Time frame: During procedure, up to 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure
Number of Participants Requiring intubation
Need for intubation
Time frame: During procedure, 24 hours after the ablation procedure
Experimental procedural duration
Experimental procedural duration
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: During procedure
noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) sub-acutely after the procedure
comparable freedom from VT at noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) sub-acutely after the procedure and at two-year follow-up.
Time frame: 24-48 hours after the procedure.
Mean and peak procedural lactate level
Mean and peak procedural lactate level
Time frame: During procedure
Cumulative procedural inotropic support use
Cumulative procedural inotropic support use
Time frame: During procedure, 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure
Hospital stay length following the procedure
Hospital stay length following the procedure
Time frame: Periprocedural hospital stay length, up to 2 weeks
Time to ventricular tachycardia (VT)
Time to recurrent VT or censoring at 1 year (detection 10 bpm \< rate of slowest VT)
Time frame: 1 year
Antiarrhythmic Drugs requirement
Antiarrhythmic Drugs requirement following the procedure
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Change in LVEF at 6 months at regular clinic follow-ups following the procedure
Time frame: 6 months after the study
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV)
Change in EDV at 6 months at regular clinic follow-ups following the procedure
Time frame: 6 months after the study