The research team has developed an interventional group program for young men living with HIV and will be adapting it for telehealth delivery. The purpose of the study is to determine whether or not this program can help improve social connections and the health of young men in online delivery and evaluate its potential for implementation in a community setting. The study has three phases: (1) engaging a community advisory board to create and adapt the intervention for online delivery, (2) a randomized clinical trial of the online intervention, and (3) evaluation of the program for community implementation with our partner organization. Participants in the second phase of the study will meet with a study team member to discuss the research process and provide informed consent. The community organization employees will provide consent online prior to completion of a survey and indicate whether they consent to be contacted further for in-depth interviews.
Subjects will participate in synchronous, online discussion sessions via videoconference for two hours per week over a six-week period. Sessions will include engaging educational components and interactive activities including discussions of case scenarios and sharing of personal experiences where desired. At the end of each videoconference session, participants will be asked to complete a brief session evaluation form in which they will rate the content, facilitation, and overall experience for the week. The long-term goal is to improve engagement across the HIV continuum of care (HIV-CoC) by enhancing individual- and community-level resilience processes among young Black gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (YB-GBMSM) living with HIV. To this end, the research team has used community-based participatory research methods to develop Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers (B6), a novel group-level intervention designed to affirm intersectional identities and augment social capital among YB-GBMSM. The goal of this current study is to adapt and pilot B6 for telehealth delivery (creating tele-B6) within the context of an established community-based organization (CBO), as a strategy for enhancing feasibility and scalability prior to a larger efficacy trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Participants will be part of the Tele-B6 intervention that includes six group sessions delivered over the course of six weeks. Survey assessments for the intervention group (first phase) will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline).
Wait-list control participants will be assigned to a group for initiation of the full intervention beginning at month 4 after their enrollment (i.e., beginning after they, and their corresponding intervention group, have completed their intervention and two follow-up surveys). Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (preintervention), 6 months (immediate post-intervention), and 8 months (post-intervention).
Grady Infectious Diseases Program Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Acceptability
Qualitative interviews: Open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Study Exit (up to 8* months)
Change in the Acceptability Surveys
Post-session evaluation forms (adapted from original B6) after each group session. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Change in Recruitment Rates
Rates of participation from screened and eligible participants. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Change in retention
Attendance logs during each visit. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Change in the intervention fidelity
Review of the Structured intervention logs (adapted from original B6) \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Safety (adverse events)
Review of Adverse event tracking forms \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: During study participation up to 8* months
Change in Perception of Structural Racism and Discrimination.
Participants will complete surveys measuring socioeconomic status, material resources scale. The material resources survey has 18 questions asking how often the participants' family needs are adequately met. There are six options (never=0; rarely=1; less than half of the time=w, about half of the time=3; more than half of the time=4; and always=5). The highest score means that needs are adequately met. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8* months
Change in Perception of discrimination
Participants will complete the Everyday Discrimination Scale at baseline and after each session. Each response is given a value according to the Likert scale ('never'=1 to 'almost everyday'=6). Responses are summed across items to produce a score ranging from 10 to 60. A higher score may indicate higher perception of discrimination. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Change in Perception of HIV stigma
Participants will complete the HIV stigma scale at baseline and after each session. This scale includes which includes 10 item stigma rated on a 5-point scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree". \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Change in Perception of internalized homonegativity inventory
Participants will complete the internalized homonegativity inventory at baseline and after each session. This 26-item scale has four subscales: (a) Public Identification as Gay, (b) Perception of Stigma Associated with Being Gay, (c) Social Comfort with Gay Men, (d) Moral and Religious Acceptability of Being Gay. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Qualitative description of intersectional stigma
Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Exit of study (up to 8 months)
Change in intersectional stigma
Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Exit of study (up to 8 months)
Change in logistical barriers
Participants will be asked to complete surveys and matched to Zipcode to derive neighborhood measures. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Qualitative description of logistical barriers
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Exit of study (up to 8 months)
Changes in perception of individual resilience process: Identity Affirmation
Participants will complete the multidimensional model of black identity lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity scale, \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Qualitative description individual resilience process: Identity Affirmation
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Exit of study (up to 8 months)
Changes in the community resilience process: social capital
Participants will complete the personal social capital scale. A five-point Likert scale is used to assess these questions with 1 = none and 5 = all. A composite score will be derived by summarizing the item scores such that a higher score indicates a greater perceived collective efficacy. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Qualitative description of the community resilience process: social capital
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Exit of study (up to 8 months)
Changes in the perception of minority stress: depression
Participants will complete the Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) survey. In scoring the CES-D, a value of 0, 1, 2, or 3 is assigned to a response depending upon whether the item is worded positively or negatively. The possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Changes in the perception of minority stress: general well-being
Participants will complete the general well-being (GWB) survey. The General Well-Being Schedule (GWB) is designed to assess an individual's mental health or quality of life. The GWB consists of 18 items indicating subjective feelings of psychological well-being and distress. All of the items utilize the past month as the time frame of interest. The first 14 questions use a six-point rating scale that represents either intensity or frequency. The remaining items use a 0-10 rating scale that is anchored by adjectives. Because some items are reverse scored (items 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 16), 14 is subtracted from the total score, yielding a total possible range of scores from 0 to 110. Low scores represent greater distress. Proposed cutoffs representing three levels of distress are 0-60 (severe distress), 61-72 (moderate distress), and 73-110 (positive well-being). \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, up to 8* months
Qualitative description of the minority stress
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide. There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview. \*8-month timepoint only applies to waitlist control participants
Time frame: Exit of study (up to 8 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.