This study examines the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual tumor board for cancer and mental illness for patients with serious mental illness and a new cancer diagnosis. The study also examines the impact on patient care, psychiatric symptoms, and clinician self-efficacy in managing this population.
Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience increased cancer mortality because of inequities in cancer care. Access to mental health and cancer care remains inadequate. Virtual tumor boards have been associated with higher rates of patients receiving guideline-concordant cancer care, but these tumor boards have not been adapted for cancer and mental illness. A virtual cancer and mental health tumor board intervention has potential to increase access to psycho-oncology and oncology expertise, facilitate clinician communication, and may address barriers to cancer and mental health care. The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual tumor board for cancer and mental illness for our target population for patients and clinicians. We will also explore changes in cancer care, psychiatric symptoms, and clinician self-efficacy in managing this population. This study is a single-arm pilot (n = 30) based at a cancer center affiliate and the surrounding community. The intervention includes proactive identification using a registry, bi-monthly virtual equity tumor board focused on cancer and mental health using HIPAA-compliant videoconference that uses co-learning, assessment of barriers to cancer care, strengths, and goals of care, creating plans that identify who is responsible for next steps and patient communication, and relaying recommendations to patients and the treating oncology team.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
The Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board intervention aims to increase access to psycho-oncology and oncology expertise, facilitate clinician communication, build understanding of the person's needs and strengths, and address barriers to care. Strategies include a proactive assessment of illness understanding, psychiatric history, and barriers to care followed by development of an integrated cancer and mental health treatment plan during the tumor board session that is framed in terms of patient values and addresses barriers to accessing psycho-oncology and specialty oncology expertise. These recommendations will be shared with treating oncologists, documented in the medical record, and shared with the patient. Patients will receive a transition phone call at 12 weeks.
Mass General/North Shore Center for Outpatient Care
Danvers, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGPatient enrollment assessed by consent rate.
The investigators will evaluate program feasibility through patient enrollment by examining consent rates (60% of eligible patients consent).
Time frame: At baseline
Patient trial completion assessed by number of patients who complete study assessments and trial procedures.
The investigators will evaluate trial completion assessed by number of patients who complete study assessments and trial procedures (75% of patient participants have baseline targeted assessment, have tumor board recommendations communicated with them, and complete 12-week assessment of psychiatric symptoms and barriers to cancer care).
Time frame: 12 weeks from study enrollment
Patient satisfaction assessed by patient feedback questionnaire.
The investigators will evaluate program acceptability through patient intervention satisfaction by a patient feedback questionnaire (exit interview surveys with participating patients regarding the usefulness of the intervention) at 12 weeks.
Time frame: 12 weeks from study enrollment
Volume of tumor board session attendance by tumor board participants.
The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by tracking volume of tumor board session attendance (feasibility defined as participants attending 80% of sessions when patients/clients discussed).
Time frame: 24 weeks from study enrollment
Tumor board participant satisfaction assessed by tumor board participant feedback questionnaire.
The investigators will evaluate program acceptability by examining participant intervention satisfaction (feedback questionnaire at end of study period regarding the acceptability and helpfulness of the virtual tumor board model).
Time frame: 24 weeks from study enrollment
Number of participants contributing to multi-disciplinary representation at tumor board sessions.
The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by examining the amount of multi-disciplinary representation at tumor board sessions (\>70% of sessions include representation from oncology/cancer center affiliate, community mental health, and psycho-oncology).
Time frame: 24 weeks from study enrollment
Percentage of tumor board participants participating in tumor board session.
The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by tracking percentage of tumor board participants participating in tumor board sessions (80% of participants complete intra-session feedback questionnaire).
Time frame: 24 weeks from study enrollment
Percentage of tumor board participants completing study questionnaires.
The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by examining completion of study measures (70% of participants complete 12-week- and 24-week measures).
Time frame: 24 weeks from study enrollment
Tumor board participant satisfaction assessed by in-session feedback questionnaire.
The investigators will evaluate program acceptability by examining participant intervention satisfaction (in-session feedback questionnaire regarding the acceptability and helpfulness of the virtual tumor board model).
Time frame: 24 weeks from study enrollment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.