Effect of Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

N/AEnrolling By InvitationNCT05837780

Minia University36 enrolled

Overview

This study includes Three Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Changes After Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients (Randomized Controlled Trial) Null hypothesis: there is no difference between using conventionally constructed nasoalveolar molding device and using digitally constructed nasoalveolar molding device

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Interventions

Nasoalveolar molding deviceOTHER

comparison between using conventionally and digitally constructed nasoalveolar molding devices

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 7 DaysMax age: 1 MonthHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: Good general health without any systematic disease, disability or other syndromes Non syndromatic unilateral cleft lip and palate Both genders Age less than one month Parents willing to participate in the study and sign informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patients exhibiting systemic disease, disability or other syndrome, parents denying participating in the study or not given their informed consent

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry ,Minya university

Minya, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Alveolar cleft width

measurement of width between two alveolar segments

Time frame: 3 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.