This study is being done to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the study drug, TP-04, in participants with papulopustular rosacea (PPR).
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) applied BID for 12 weeks in participants with moderate to severe PPR.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
37
Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) is an aqueous gel formulation of lotilaner, a member of the isoxazoline family of compounds and parasiticide that selectively inhibits parasite-specific gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-gated chloride channels (GABA-Cls).
Aqueous gel
The Centre for Clinical Trials
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
SKiN Centre for Dermatology
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
K. Papp Clinical Research
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Innovaderm Research Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events from baseline
Incidence of local and systemic TEAEs while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel from baseline
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in height in cm
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in height in cm while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in weight in kg
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in weight in kg while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in vtial signs change in systolic/diastolic blood pressure in mmHg
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in systolic/diastolic blood pressure in mmHg while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in pulse in beats per minute
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in pulse in beats per minute while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in respiratory rate in breaths per minute
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in respiratory rate in breaths per minute while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in temperature in Celsius
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Canada
Changes from baseline in vital signs change in temperature in Celsius while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Change from baseline in ECGs change in QRS interval in msec
Changes from baseline in ECGs change in QRS interval in msec while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes from baseline in ECGs change in mean ventricular rate (beats/min)
Changes from baseline in ECGs change in mean ventricular rate (beats/min) while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes in baseline in ECGs change in QTC interval in msec
Changes from baseline in ECGs change in QTC interval in msec while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes in clinical chemistry laboratory assessments from baseline
Changes from baseline clinical chemistry laboratory values while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Changes in hematology laboratory assessments from baseline
Changes from baseline hematology laboratory values while using Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Local tolerability assessment ((0=none, 3=severe): dryness, scaling, erythema, burning/stinging; itching)
Evaluate local tolerability assessment ((0=none, 3=severe): dryness, scaling, erythema, burning/stinging; itching) of Lotilaner Gel, 2.0% (TP-04) versus vehicle control gel
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Improvement in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score (0=clear; 4=severe)
Proportion (%) of participants achieving ≥ 2-point improvement in IGA score to clear (0) or almost clear (1)
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Facial Inflammatory lesion counts - absolute change from baseline
Absolute change from baseline in facial inflammatory lesion counts
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Facial inflammatory lesion counts - percent change from baseline
Percent change from baseline in facial inflammatory lesion counts
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Investigator Global Assessmen (IGA) Score (0=clear; 4=severe) - absolute change from baseline
Absolute change from baseline in IGA score
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Score (0=clear; 4=severe) - absolute change from baseline
Absolute change from baseline in CEA score
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (0=no itch; 10= worst imaginable itch) - absolute change from baseline
Absolute change from baseline in worst pruritus NRS score
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (0=no pain; 10= worst imaginable pain) - absolute change from baseline
Absolute change from baseline in worst pain NRS score
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12
Improvement in Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (0=no itch; 10= worst imaginable itch)
Proportion (%) of participants achieving at least a 4-point reduction in worst pruritus NRS score (0= no itch; 10= worst imaginable itch)
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 12