The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether primary total pancreatectomy with simultaneous islet autotransplantation compared with pancreatic head resection (alone) can reduce perioperative morbidity and time to initiation of adjuvant therapy in patients with a high-risk constellation for pancreatic fistulas.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
32
Islet cells are isolated from patients healthy pancreatic tissue. Following total pancreatectomy, these autologous cells are injected into the portal vein, to implant in the liver and produce insulin.
As a standard procedure, the tumor-affected region of the pancreatic head with surrounding tissue and lymph nodes is removed during surgery. Reconstruction is performed by pancreaticojejunostomy.
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden
Dresden, Germany
RECRUITINGDuration between surgery and time "fit for adjuvant treatment" (postoperative day X)
Time (days) between surgery and the date of certified fitness to begin adjuvant therapy, confirmed by an oncology consult, starting at day of discharge, than assessed at POD 90, POD 180, POD 365, 24 months
Time frame: From day of discharge until confirmed fitness for adjuvant treatment or 24 months, whichever came first
Comparison of actual start of adjuvant therapy in both arms
Postoperative day on which adjuvant therapy was started
Time frame: From POD 90 until actual start of therapy or 24 months whichever came first
Rate of peri-operative morbidity/mortality acc. to Clavien-Dindo classification
Rate of peri-operative morbidity/mortality will be assessed acc. to Clavien-Dindo classification
Time frame: After enrolment of the patient until 24 months after intervention
Rate of (serious) adverse events
Rate of (serious) adverse events, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE Version 5.0, 2017)
Time frame: After randomization of the patient until 24 months after intervention
Patient reported outcomes: Quality of life EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
The QoL analyses will include QoL mean values, QoL response. EORTC QLQ C30 contains 30 questions28 questions regarding body fitness, daily routines, restrictions at work and hobby, appetite, fatigue, cough, breathlessness, pain, tiredness, and body conditions from (1) to (4); 1 (not a bit), 2 (little), 3 (moderate), 4 (much). 2 questions regarding state of health and Quality of life with a horizontal rating from 1 to 7; 1 (very bad), 7 (excellent).; assessed at POD 90, POD 180, POD 365, and 24 months after surgery
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Patient reported outcomes: Quality of life EORTC PAN26 questionnaire
The QoL analyses will include QoL mean values, QoL response. EORTC QLQ PAN26 contains 30 questions regarding pain, nutrition, body fitness, sexuality, from (1) to (4); 1 (not a bit), 2 (little), 3 (moderate), 4 (much). 28 questions regarding body fitness, daily routines, restrictions at work and hobby, appetite, fatigue, cough, breathlessness, pain, tiredness, and body conditions from (1) to (4); 1 (not a bit), 2 (little), 3 (moderate), 4 (much); , assessed at POD 90, POD 180, POD 365, and 24 months after surgery 2 questions regarding state of health and Quality of life with a horizontal rating from 1 to 7; 1 (very bad), 7 (excellent).
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Metabolic outcome will be determined on continuous monitoring of glucose (CGM) in plasma (mmol/L) at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: glucagon
Metabolic outcome will be determined on the hormone glucagon in plasma at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: glycohemoglobin HbA1c
Metabolic outcome will be determined on glycohemoglobin (HbA1c in %) at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: C-peptide
Metabolic outcome will be determined on serum C-peptide (nmol/L) as measure for functionality of pancreas at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: fructosamine
Metabolic outcome will be determined on serum fructosamine (µmol/L) at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: insulin requirement
Metabolic outcome will be determined on requirement of insulin (yes/no) at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: number of hypoglycemic events
Metabolic outcome will be determined on number of hypoglycemic events (defined as value of blood glucose below 3.5 mmol/l) at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of metabolic outcome in both arms: severity of hypoglycemia
Metabolic outcome will be determined on severity of hypoglycemic events (decrease of blood glucose level) at every visit: Screening, POD 1, POD 3, day of discharge, POD 90, POD 180, POD 365 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: From date of screening until 24 months after intervention
Comparison of long-term oncological course (24 months) in both arms: tumor markers
Within 24 months after intervention, oncological outcome is evaluated, as measured by tumor markers CA 19-9, CEA
Time frame: 24 months after intervention
Comparison of long-term oncological course (24 months) in both arms: recurrence
Within 24 months after intervention, oncological outcome is evaluated, as measured by recurrences of tumor shown in CT imaging
Time frame: 24 months after intervention
Comparison of long-term oncological course (24 months) in both arms: occurence of metastases
Within 24 months after intervention, oncological outcome is evaluated, as measured by metastases shown in CT imaging
Time frame: 24 months after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.