The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether hearing test results using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will help to fast-track early intervention for infants born with a hearing loss. fNIRS is a method of imaging brain activity using light. The main questions are: 1. Can audiologists make more confident decisions about the optimal interventions at different critical points in the hearing care pathway when they are given additional fNIRS information compared to when they have standard audiology test results alone? 2. Is the experience of their infant having an fNIRS test acceptable and comfortable for the parents or care givers?
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has reduced the age of diagnosis of permanent childhood hearing loss from several years down to several weeks. While this is highly desirable, the early diagnosis raises challenges for the audiologists who manage these infants. The challenges are due to a lack of relevant audiological information, particularly about an infant's ability to discriminate between different speech sounds, and, for infants with Auditory Neuropathy, their degree of hearing impairment, which is required to make key management decisions. The missing information causes intervention delays at several time-critical points along the standard hearing care pathway that could seriously affect speech and language development for the infant, with life-long social, educational and employment consequences. The goal of this trial is to assess whether the addition of audiological information provided by fNIRS assessments can address these challenges for audiologists who care for infants with different types of hearing loss and at the different critical decision points in the care pathway. A pool of at least 40 experienced audiologists will be recruited to participate in the study. In addition, infants with different types and degree of hearing loss, and at the different critical points in their care pathway will be recruited to provide fNIRS test results. For each infant, a group of ten paediatric audiologists will be randomly selected from the large pool and will be provided with anonymised audiological test results. Each audiologist will receive the current test results of the infant twice, once with, and once without the additional fNIRS test results, with 2 months between. Half (5 randomly selected) will receive the standard plus additional fNIRS test results before the standard-alone results and the other half in reverse order. The audiologists will be asked, via a questionnaire, to make clinical decisions relevant to the infant's point in the hearing care pathway and to rate their confidence in their decisions on a sliding scale. Infants will be recruited for fNIRS tests at each of four points in the care pathway (after diagnosis, after first hearing aid provision, when optimal hearing aid program is established, and after cochlear implantation. The critical management decisions at these four points are, respectively: Is a hearing aid needed?; Is the hearing aid optimally programmed for the infant?; Would the infant be better off with a cochlear implant instead of their hearing aid?; and Is the cochlear implant programmed optimally for the infant? Parents/guardians will also be surveyed about their experience with the fNIRS test.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
Infants with hearing loss will be tested using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and a patented analysis algorithm to measure sound detection and discrimination. Their standard audiological test results will also be collected from their audiology service provider/s. Both sets of test results will be given to the participating audiologists in the experimental arm.
The provision of test results to the audiologist will be the same as in the experimental arm, but without the fNIRS test results included.
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGBionics Institute
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGBarwon Health
Geelong, Victoria, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHearing Australia
Moonee Ponds, Victoria, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGThe Royal Children's Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGChange in confidence of audiological clinical management decisions when fNIRS hearing test results are included with standard audiological information compared to when using standard information alone
The questionnaire responses that the participating audiologists provide will measure their confidence in making the appropriate next decision for the infant using a sliding scale (0 (no confidence) to 100 (high confidence)). The data from the sliding scale responses for the same audiologist/infant will be subtracted (confidence with fNIRS minus confidence without fNIRS) to obtain the raw data for analysis.
Time frame: Between each infant's completed fNIRS testing session and 2 months after
Parental/Guardian perception of acceptability of fNIRS test process and usefulness of fNIRS test results
The results of a parent questionnaire developed by the Advisory Committee (which includes parent members) will be qualitatively evaluated to determine if the fNIRS test process was acceptable, and the test results were perceived as useful. The results will also indicate whether there are aspects of the test process that could be improved in future to make it more acceptable to parents.
Time frame: Within 2 weeks after their child's fNIRS testing session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.