Evaluation of the Effect of Leukocyte and Platelet-rich Fibrin on Healing After Periradicular Surgery

Overview

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of two different periapical surgery methods ("curettage+apical resection" and "curettage") on the bone regeneration and clinical healing without applying any material or with applying leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) to the periradicular intraosseous defect in the treatment of the teeth with large periapical lesions by following the patients for 12 months.

Materials and Methods: Apical periodontitis is a local response of the bone around the root tip of the tooth to necrosis of the pulp tissue. In the treatment of apical periodontitis, it is primarily aimed to remove the pathogenic microorganisms responsible for the infection with root canal treatment. The success of root canal treatment depends on the complete repair and regeneration of periapical tissues, and most of the periapical lesions heal satisfactorily after root canal treatment, but there are cases where infection and persistent symptoms persist despite root canal treatment. In these cases, periapical surgery with endodontic retreatment is required to eliminate pathological tissues, eliminate the source of irritation and support the healing process. For this purpose, 2 different periapical surgical methods are performed. In the first method, which is a more radical technique, the tip of the root of the related tooth responsible for apical periodontitis is resected (apicectomy) after curettage of the bone defect area. In the second method, in which the tooth tissue is preserved with a more conservative approach, only the defect area is curetted without root tip resection. Different results regarding the clinical success of these two methods have been reported in the literature. In many studies, apicectomy is accepted as principal part of periapical surgical procedures and a prerequisite for the success of treatment but, roots that have already weakened and thinned due to periodontitis become more prone to fracture. In addition, especially in cases where the ratio between crown and root length is impaired, the stability of the restoration is adversely affected and the stability of the tooth in the socket may become questionable in the long term. In the literature, there are only a few case reports and a clinical study evaluating the clinical success of periapical surgery performed with periapical curettage without apicectomy following endodontic retreatment. In recent years, many studies have been carried out to increase the success of apical surgery by accelerating and increasing the formation of new bone in the defect area with regenerative applications. Leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) is a second-generation platelet concentrate that forms an organized fibrin network in which platelets and leukocytes are trapped. In the few studies in the literature regarding the use of L-PRF alone without combining with a graft, in periapical surgery, apical surgery has been performed with root tip resection. In the literature, there is only one case series evaluating the effect of L-PRF application on periapical intraosseous defect after apical curettage without apicectomy on clinical and radiological healing. In the treatment of apical periodontitis cases whith persistant symptoms and infection despite root canal treatment; more successful long-term results are aimed to be achieved by curettage of the periapical lesion and placement of L-PRF in the intraosseous defect after endodontic retreatment providing acceleration of apical bone regeneration, reducing clinical symptoms, and preserving the tooth root with a more conservative approach. 60 volunteer patients over the age of 18 who applied to Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics and were diagnosed with refractory chronic apical periodontitis due to a periapical lesion of endodontic origin that did not respond to root canal treatment, will be included in the study, regardless of gender. Periapical surgery will be applied in all patients following the endodontic retreatment. Patients will be randomly divided into 4 groups of 15 patients in each group: 1. Group: Surgical curettage of the periapical lesion and root tip resection will be performed, MTA will be applied retrogradely and no material will be applied to the bone defect (Retrograde Filling Group / RG Group). 2. Group: Surgical curettage of the periapical lesion and root tip resection will be performed, MTA will be applied retrogradely and L-PRF will be applied to the bone defect (Retrograde Filling+L-PRF Group / RG+L-PRF Group). 3. Group: Surgical curettage of the periapical lesion will be performed, MTA will be applied orthogradely without root tip resection and no material will be applied to the bone defect (Orthograde Filling Group / OG Group). 4. Group: Surgical curettage of the periapical lesion will be performed, MTA will be applied orthogradely without root tip resection and L-PRF will be applied to the bone defect (Orthograde Filling+L-PRF Group / OG+L-PRF Group). All surgical operations will be performed by the same surgeon, and all endodontic treatments will be performed by the same endodontist. Patients will be called for control for clinical and radiographic evaluation at 1. week and 1., 3., 6., 9., and 12. months. The PAI (Periapical index) score and the dimensions of the periapical radiolucency will be evaluated on the periapical radiographs taken at the control sessions. In addition, pain, swelling, tooth mobility, sensitivity to percussion, sensitivity of palpation and presence of fistula will be evaluated. Patients will be given forms including a 10-unit Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and they will be asked to mark the pain they feel every day for 1 week postoperatively and to record the number of painkillers they use.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes