This was a Phase 2 study in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SAR442970 compared to placebo.
The study duration was up to 40 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
86
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Biologic and Small Molecule Immunosuppressive-Naïve Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50) at Week 16
The HiSCR50 was used for assessing HS treatment effectiveness in controlling inflammatory manifestations in the population. HiSCR50 was defined as \>=50% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug. Percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Time to Onset of Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50)
Time to onset of achieving HiSCR50 during the DB period was defined as the time from randomization to the first time of achieving HiSCR50 by Week 16. HiSCR50 was defined as \>=50% reduction from baseline in the total AN count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR75) at Week 16
The HiSCR75 was used for assessing HS treatment effectiveness in controlling inflammatory manifestations in the population. HiSCR75 was defined as \>=75% reduction from baseline in the total AN count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
Time frame: Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR90) at Week 16
The HiSCR90 was used for assessing HS treatment effectiveness in controlling inflammatory manifestations in the population. HiSCR90 was defined as \>=90% reduction from baseline in the total AN count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Medical Dermatology Specialists Site Number : 8400007
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Renstar Medical Research Site Number : 8400011
Ocala, Florida, United States
ForCare Clinical Research Site Number : 8400006
Tampa, Florida, United States
Advanced Medical Research PC Site Number : 8400002
Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States
Clinical Partners, LLC Site Number : 8400010
Johnston, Rhode Island, United States
Center for Clinical Studies, LTD. LLP Site Number : 8400003
Houston, Texas, United States
Investigational Site Number : 0360002
Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Investigational Site Number : 0360003
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Investigational Site Number : 0560001
Leuven, Belgium
Investigational Site Number : 1240001
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
...and 35 more locations
Time frame: Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Improvement by at Least 1 International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Stage at Week 16
The IHS4 was a validated tool to assess HS severity. The determination of IHS4 required counting inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels and multiplying each by a specific coefficient. IHS4 score was calculated as: (number of inflammatory nodules multiplied by 1) + (number of abscesses multiplied by 2) + (number of draining tunnels multiplied by 4). A categorial IHS4 score was derived from this weighted score with total score range: mild: (\<=3), moderate: (4 to 10) and severe: (\>=11); higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Improvement in IHS4 by \>=1 IHS4 stage was considered clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Absolute Score in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4)
The IHS4 was a validated tool to assess HS severity. The determination of IHS4 required counting inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels and multiplying each by a specific coefficient. IHS4 score was calculated as: (number of inflammatory nodules multiplied by 1) + (number of abscesses multiplied by 2) + (number of draining tunnels multiplied by 4). A categorial IHS4 score was derived from this weighted score with total score range: mild: (\<=3), moderate: (4 to 10) and severe: (\>=11); higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Flare Relative to Baseline at Week 16
HS flare was defined as \>=25% increase in AN count with a \>=2 increase from baseline by Week 16. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Participants Who Achieved International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4)-55 at Week 16
The IHS4 was a validated tool to assess HS severity. The determination of IHS4 required counting inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels and multiplying each by a specific coefficient. IHS4 score was calculated as: (number of inflammatory nodules multiplied by 1) + (number of abscesses multiplied by 2) + (number of draining tunnels multiplied by 4). A categorial IHS4 score was derived from this weighted score with total score range: mild: (\<=3), moderate: (4 to 10) and severe: (\>=11); higher scores indicated worse outcomes. IHS4-55 was defined as a 55% reduction in IHS4 score from baseline. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
Time frame: Week 16
Period A (DB Period) + Period B (OLE Period): Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
An AE as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TE period. An AESI was an AE (serious or non-serious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required.
Time frame: Period A was assessed from first dose of study drug (Day 1 in Period A) up to last dose of study drug + 75 days, up to 192 days; Period B was assessed from first dose in Period B to last dose of study drug + 75 days, up to 168 days
Period A (DB Period): Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 30% Reduction and at Least 1 Unit Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Hidradenitis Suppurativa Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (HS-Skin Pain NRS) at Week 16
The HS-Skin Pain NRS was a unidimensional numeric rating scale (NRS) that allowed for rapid measure of skin pain that was administered multiple times with minimal administrative burden. The HS-Skin Pain NRS had a 24-hour recall period and was completed as a daily diary, ideally at the same time each day (evening) throughout the treatment period. Participants were asked to complete the HS-Skin Pain NRS for 7 consecutive days leading up to the baseline visit with a minimum of 4 completions in their daily diary. The HS-Skin Pain NRS was scored on a 0 to 10 scale; 0: no skin pain and 10: worst skin pain possible. Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of DB study drug.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Period A (DB Period) + Period B (OLE Period): Serum SAR442970 Concentrations
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum SAR442970 concentrations.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 10, 12 and 16 (Period A); Weeks 18, 20 and 28 (Period B)
Period B (OLE Period) + Period A+B (DB+OLE Period): Number of Participants With Anti-SAR442970 Antibody Response
Serum samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of anti-SAR442970 antibody response. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) were defined as participants with at least 1 treatment-induced/boosted ADA at any time after first study drug administration up to the last available ADA sample collection. Number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA response are presented.
Time frame: Period B: Placebo-SAR442970 arm were assessed from first dose of study drug in Period B up to approximately 20 weeks. Period A+B: SAR442970-SAR442970 arm were assessed from first dose of study drug in Period A up to 36 weeks