The goal of this pilot trial is to test the feasibility and acceptability as well as efficacy of the adapted intervention, CHOICES-PLEAS (Pregnancy Liberated from Exposure to Alcohol and Substances) among women will illicit polysubstance use participating in a court-mandated jail-based 90-day substance use disorder treatment program. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the CHOICES-PLEAS intervention in a court-mandated jail-based substance use disorder treatment program? 2. Does participation in CHOICES-PLEAS lower the risk of a substance exposed pregnancy at 1 and 3 months after release compared to a control condition? 3. Does participation in CHOICES-PLEAS increase motivation to change substance use and reduce risky sexual behaviors at 1 and 3 months after release compared to a control condition? Participants will receive three one-on-one motivational interviewing sessions and one family planning referral visit during incarceration and one booster session at 1 month after release from jail. Researchers will compare the CHOICES-PLEAS intervention to a control condition to see if participation in the intervention reduces risk of substance exposed pregnancy, increases motivation to change substance use, and reduces risk of risky sexual behaviors.
The investigators will recruit 90 female participants from one of two jail-based SUD treatment programs: the court-mandated substance use disorder treatment program (CM-SUDTx) or the Medication for Addiction Treatment (MAT) Program to participate in pilot testing of the intervention, CHOICES-PLEAS. Research staff will describe the study at an initial CM-SUDTx meeting or with MAT program participants and invite interested women to meet with staff individually after their treatment session to be screened for eligibility. Over a 2.5-year period, there are ten 90-day CM-SUDTx cohorts, each with approximately 15 women (150 total). The investigators expect 130 women (13/cohort, 87%) to meet eligibility criteria. Of those eligible, the investigators expect about 9/cohort will enroll and complete the intervention based on pilot work indicating about 70% of CM-SUDTx participants are interested in research. Women in the MAT program have a diagnosis of OUD with or without additional substance use. The same inclusion criteria will be used to determine eligibility with the addition of participants needing to be confined between 2 and 6 months to allow time for study procedures to take place during incarceration. The investigators will randomize the ten CM-SUDTx cohorts to receive CHOICES-PLEAS (45 women) or brief advice and referral (45 women) over a 2.5 year period using a matching process before randomization to achieve balance between cohorts in the intervention and control groups. The treatment cohorts will be divided into two cells by program start time within the study period (Year 2 quarter 2 through Year 4 quarter 3). The first 5 cohorts will be placed in cell one and the second 5 cohorts in cell two. Cohorts will be randomly selected within each of these two cells to be assigned to either the intervention or control group to ensure 5 cohorts will receive CHOICES-PLEAS (9 women per cohort, n=45) and 5 will receive brief advice and referral (9 women per cohort, n=45). Participants recruited from the MAT program will be randomized by individual. All participants will complete a baseline survey before the intervention. The investigators will collect comprehensive participant contact information for all participants after participants complete a baseline survey. The 5 treatment cohorts and MAT program participants randomized to receive the intervention (n=45 women, 9 per cohort over 2.5 years) will participate in CHOICES-PLEAS. Research staff will administer the three motivational interviewing sessions one-on-one over an 8-week period. Referral and scheduling of a family planning appointment will take place in session 1 and the appointment may be scheduled at any time prior to completion of the CM-SUDTx or release from jail. The 5 treatment cohorts and MAT program participants randomized to the control group (n=45 women, 9 per cohort over 2. years) will receive brief advice and referral consistent with other studies testing a similar intervention that includes general information about healthy lifestyle for women as well as a referral guide to local resources. At completion of the CM-SUDTx or prior to release from jail, all participants will complete a survey. Women will be asked to review and update their contact information sheet and the one-month booster session and three-month assessment will be scheduled. At 1-month post release, participants randomized in the intervention group will participate in a one-on-one motivational interviewing booster session at a convenient location. At 1- and 3-months post-release, all participants will complete an in-person assessment at a convenient location where they will complete a survey to measure continuation in treatment, provide a urine drug screen and pregnancy test, and reassess all measures collected at the time of release.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
90
CHOICES-PLEAS includes four manual-guided motivational interviewing sessions delivered by a trained counselor and one family planning counseling session delivered by a family planning clinician. The intervention is based on the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change and motivational interviewing that includes a decisional balance exercise, goal self-selection, self-monitoring, self-generated plans, and importance and confidence scales. By using a patient-centered approach based on the TTM that meets patients where they are, counselors can have a more effective impact on patient behaviors. This adaptation from the original CHOICES intervention contains unique features focused on the incarcerated setting, illicit polysubstance use, and risky sexual behaviors most common among women with illicit polysubstance use.
Buzz Westfall Justice Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGNumber of participants with a change in risk of substance exposed pregnancy compared to baseline using Timeline Followback method assessing substance use and risky sexual behaviors
Defined as continued drug abstinence, absence of risky sexual behaviors, or both
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
Self-efficacy to change substance use
Self-efficacy will be assessed using the single item Abstinence Self-Efficacy scale with scores ranging from 1-10 with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
Self-efficacy to change risky sexual behavior
Self-efficacy will be assessed using the adapted 18-item Self-efficacy for Birth Control and Condom Use Scale with scores 18 - 90, with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
Readiness to change substance use
Readiness to change will be assessed using the adapted 12-item Readiness to Change Questionnaire for substance use with scores from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher levels of readiness.
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
Readiness to change risky sexual behavior
Readiness to change will be assessed using the adapted 11-item Readiness to Change Questionnaire for risky sexual behaviors with scores from 11 to 55 with higher scores indicating higher levels of readiness
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
Decisional balance to change substance use
Decisional balance will be assessed using the 20-item Decisional Balance Scale for substance use. Each question asking about importance of making a decision is rated from 1 to 5, with 5 being extremely important and 1 being not important at all. A difference score is calculated by subtracting scores of the cons of substance use from the pros of substance use. Positive numbers indicate endorsing more pros than cons for substance use.
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
Decisional balance to change contraception use
Decisional balance will be assessed using the 20-item Decisional Balance Scale for contraception use. Each question asking about importance of making a decision is rated from 1 to 5, with 5 being extremely important and 1 being not important at all. A difference score is calculated by subtracting scores of the cons of using contraception from the pros of using contraception. Positive numbers indicate endorsing more pros than cons for using contraception.
Time frame: one and three months after release from jail
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.