This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two strategies for closing large caliber venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: compression with figure-of-8 suture versus closure with the Perclose-Proglide system.
This is a retrospective observational study that aims to compare two strategies for closing large-caliber femoral venous access in patients who have undergone percutaneous procedures. The study's goal is to determine if there are significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety between the two closure strategies. Figure-of-8 suture compression is a well-established technique that has been used for decades to close large-bore femoral venous access, while the Perclose-Proglide system is a relatively new medical device that could have great utility for the closure of large-bore femoral venous access. By comparing these two strategies, researchers hope to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Perclose-Proglide system for closing large-bore femoral venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Patients who have required Perclose-Proglide system in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Patients who have required the manual compression with figure-of-8 in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGAssessment of Major vascular complications
Incidence of patients with Major vascular complications
Time frame: 30 days
Assessment of Major vascular complications
Incidence of patients with Major vascular complications
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of rebleeding
Incidence of patients with rebleeding
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Rebleeding
Incidence of patients with rebleeding
Time frame: 30 days
Assessment of Death
Incidence of dead patients
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Death
Incidence of dead patients
Time frame: 30 days
Assessment of Death related to vascular access
Incidence of dead patients related to vascular access
Time frame: 30 days
Assessment of Death related to vascular access
Incidence of dead patients related to vascular access
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Hematoma
Incidence of patients with hematoma the venous puncture
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 24 hours
Assessment of Hematoma Size
Area in cm of the hematoma at the venous puncture in patients with hematoma
Time frame: 24 hours
Assessment of Vascular access point infection
Incidence of patients with infection in vascular access point
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Vascular access point infection
Incidence of patients with infection in vascular access point
Time frame: 30 days
Assessment of Urinary infections
Incidence of patients with urinary infection
Time frame: 30 days
Assessment of Urinary infections
Incidence of patients with urinary infection
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of sitting-walking time
Time in hours between the patient sitting and walking after the vascular access
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Technical success
Technical success when complete hemostasis is less than 1 minute after closure strategy performed
Time frame: 1 minute after closure performed
Assessment of Clinical success
Technical success in the absence of events after closure strategy
Time frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)