In this study, the investigators use a novel endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner-the Gastric Bypass Stent System (Hangzhou Tangji Medical Technology Co., Ltd., China) for the treatment of obesity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new device on weight loss and obesity-associated metabolic parameters.
This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm study conducted at the department of gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University in China. In this study, all the participants were implanted with the Gastric Bypass Stent System. The device had an intended implantation time of 12 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 24 weeks. Both the implantation and explantation were conducted under general anesthesia. A liquid diet was required for a week after implantation to reduce the risk of early obstruction or migration. All the participants received an oral proton pump inhibitor twice daily during the implantation and within 4 weeks of removal. Primary outcomes were changes in excess weight loss and total weight loss at 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance, liver enzymes, lipids and uric acid at 12 and 24 weeks, and device safety. At the first visit, baseline demographics, medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests were collected. The subjects were scheduled for follow-up visit at 1, 4, 12, 16 and 24 weeks. At each visit, body weight was measured and symptoms were recorded. Blood and fecal samples were collected to observe the changes of metabolic parameters and also to monitor the adverse effects. A complete blood count, liver function, blood glucose, insulin, HbA1C, lipids, uric acid, amylase, iron tests and fecal occult blood were partially or all measured at each visit. Insulin resistance was assessed by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), a value ≧2.69 was considered as insulin resistance. Elevated ALT or AST was considered as abnormal liver enzymes. Primary outcomes were changes in EWL and TWL at 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, BMI, insulin resistance, liver enzymes, lipids, UA at 12 and 24 weeks, and device safety.Analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corporation , Armonk, NY). Data was reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) . A p value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses of body weight changes between different time points were conducted with a paired sample t test. Analyses of metabolic parameters in the blood were calculated by generalized estimating equations (GEE) because of the existence of missing values.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
14
The Gastric Bypass Stent System is a newly designed endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of obesity by Hangzhou Tangji Medical Technology Co., Ltd.. It consists of three main parts: a 60-cm polyethylene sleeve fixed into the duodenal bulb by anchors with barbs, a delivery system and a retrieval system. Compared to the Endobarrier, it has several technical adjustments. First, it improved sleeve materials to provide better barrier properties and reduce the breeding of bacteria resulting in hepatic abscess. Second, the barbs on the anchoring system have been modified to reduce duodenal injury. Third, the delivery and retrieval system have been optimized to eliminate the need of fluoroscopic guidance during implantation and explantation.
Beijing Friendship Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Change from baseline excess weight loss at 4 weeks
excess weight loss change
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change from baseline excess weight loss at 12 weeks
excess weight loss change
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change from baseline excess weight loss at 24 weeks
excess weight loss change
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change from baseline total weight loss at 4 weeks
total weight loss change
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change from baseline total weight loss at 12 weeks
total weight loss change
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change from baseline total weight loss at 24 weeks
total weight loss change
Time frame: 24 weeks
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events to assess device safety
Time frame: within 24 weeks
Change from baseline body weight at 4 weeks
body weight change
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change from baseline body weight at 12 weeks
body weight change
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change from baseline body weight at 24 weeks
body weight change
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change from baseline body mass index at 4 weeks
body mass index change
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change from baseline body mass index at 12 weeks
body mass index change
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change from baseline body mass index at 24 weeks
body mass index change
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance at 4 weeks compared with baseline
the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were calculated by \[fasting insulin level (uU/mL)\]×\[fasting glucose level (mmol/L)\]/22.5
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance at 12 weeks compared with baseline
the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were calculated by \[fasting insulin level (uU/mL)\]×\[fasting glucose level (mmol/L)\]/22.5
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance at 24 weeks compared with baseline
the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were calculated by \[fasting insulin level (uU/mL)\]×\[fasting glucose level (mmol/L)\]/22.5
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of alanine aminotransferase at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of alanine aminotransferase
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of alanine aminotransferase at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of alanine aminotransferase
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of alanine aminotransferase at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of alanine aminotransferase
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of aspartate aminotransferase at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of aspartate aminotransferase
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of aspartate aminotransferase at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of aspartate aminotransferase
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of aspartate aminotransferase at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of aspartate aminotransferase
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of total cholesterol at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of total cholesterol
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of total cholesterol at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of total cholesterol
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of total cholesterol at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of total cholesterol
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of triglyceride at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of triglyceride
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of triglyceride at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of triglyceride
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of triglyceride at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of triglyceride
Time frame: 24 weeks
Value change of blood uric acid at 4 weeks compared with baseline
value change of blood uric acid
Time frame: 4 weeks
Value change of blood uric acid at 12 weeks compared with baseline
value change of blood uric acid
Time frame: 12 weeks
Value change of blood uric acid at 24 weeks compared with baseline
value change of blood uric acid
Time frame: 24 weeks