The researchers want to find out if an electronic application called MS CATCH can enhance patients' and doctors' experiences during and in between clinical visits. MS CATCH is a smartphone-based tool which allows patients to enter their mood related symptoms at regular intervals, which is then available to their Neurologist in their electronic medical record. The neurologist is also able to view additional information from their medical record, and receives alerts for changes reported by the patient that raise concern for the patient's mental health.
MS-CATCH (Care technology to Ascertain, Treat, and engage the Community to Heal depression in patients with Multiple Sclerosis) is a behaviorally informed, digital health, closed-loop-intervention that brings longitudinal mood reporting into the point of care. It consists of a simple tool used by the patient to improve mood reporting. This then triggers real-time alerts delivered to the clinician, who can access a comprehensive dashboard featuring risk factors and interventions to be considered, as well as resources local to the patient. This dashboard launches straight from the patient's electronic health record (EHR). MS-CATCH was designed using extensive human-centered design in all phases of development, and HIPAA compliant REDCap for electronic data capture. While the tool requires institutional approvals to launch within the UCSF EHR, the design elements could be readily repurposed using these technologies to support other institutions' requirements. Each individual care component and visualization was then developed and refined using extensive stakeholder engagement and an eye to the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation to change Behavior) principles of behavioral change, in order to promote behaviors likely to improve depression reporting, screening, comprehensive treatment and follow through.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
Participants will respond to a set of surveys every month to increase communication on mood with their clinician.
Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Mood Screening - Primary
Clinician screening of depression as documented in the electronic health record (EHR)
Time frame: 0-6 months, 0-12 months
Mood Reporting - Secondary
The percentage of patients who self-report mood at each clinical visit
Time frame: 6 months, Baseline, 12 months
Comprehensive Mood Evaluation - Secondary
The percentage of depression risk factors evaluated at each clinical visit
Time frame: 0-6 months, 0-12 months
Treatment recommendations - Secondary
The percentage of visits in which applicable care was recommended; number of preventative care recommendations
Time frame: 0-6 months, 0-12 months
Treatment recommendation follow-through - Secondary
The number/percent of preventative care recommendations followed through by next visit
Time frame: 0-6 months, 0-12 months
Adoption (uptake) - Primary
The percentage of patients using the tool during the first month of the study
Time frame: Initial month
Adoption (uptake) - Secondary
The percentage of patient-clinician dyads who use the in-clinic dashboard at first visit
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Mood scores - Primary
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) will be measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, scale: 0-21 range for depressive scale, and 0-21 range for anxiety scale, with higher score meaning more depressive or anxious symptoms
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Mood scores - Exploratory
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) assessment
Time frame: 12 months
Mood scores - Exploratory
Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9), scale: 0-27, higher indicates more severe depressive symptoms
Time frame: 0-12 months, 0-6 months, 6-12 months
Other self-reported outcome - Modified Fatigue Impact Scale - Exploratory
Evaluating possible contributors to mood: fatigue (MFIS), scale: 0-84, higher score indicates more impact
Time frame: 0-12 months, 0-6 months, 6-12 months
Other self-reported outcome - Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - Exploratory
Evaluating possible contributors to mood: sleep (PSQI), scale: 0-21, higher scores indicates worse sleep quality
Time frame: 0-12 months, 0-6 months, 6-12 months
Other self-reported outcome - Oxford-Participation and Activities Questionnaire - Exploratory
Evaluating possible contributors to mood: engagement (Ox-PAQ), scale: 0-100, higher score indicates more problems with activity and participation
Time frame: 0-12 months, 0-6 months, 6-12 months
Other self-reported outcome - Impact on Participation and Autonomy - Exploratory
Evaluating possible contributors to mood: participation (IPA), scale: 0-128, with higher score indicating more impact on a person's autonomy and participation
Time frame: 0-12 months, 0-6 months, 6-12 months
Engagment (Sustained use) - Secondary
The percentage of patients who continue to use the patient-facing tool at least quarterly
Time frame: Every 3 months
Engagement (Sustained use) - Secondary
The percentage of patient-clinician dyads in Arm 1 (early start) who continued to use the tool at the 12 month visit
Time frame: 12 months
Engagement (Sustained use) - Exploratory
Length of each session
Time frame: Baseline, 6 month, 12 month
Engagement (Sustained use) - Exploratoy
Qualitative feedback in exit interviews
Time frame: 12 month
Engagement (Sustained use) - Exploratory
Net promoter score (NPS)
Time frame: 12 month
Adherence - Secondary
The percentage of depression-reporting prompts responded to per participant on their patient-facing tool; the percentage participants responding to \>75% depression prompts
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.