In the present study, the investigators will conduct a confirmatory efficacy trial to test whether improving practice automaticity (i.e., habit formation) of self-compassionate touch improves outcomes in the predicted direction. Adults (n=440, including 20% for attrition) will be randomly assigned to: (1) the self-compassionate touch intervention plus habit formation tools ("SCT+HABITS") versus (2) the self-compassionate touch intervention alone ("SCT"). The investigators will conduct assessments at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. The SCT+HABITS condition will be used to evaluate whether providing habit formation tools results in superior effects to SCT. The intervention will be delivered entirely online.
Specific Aim 1: Evaluate whether SCT+HABITS shows more practice frequency and practice automaticity from baseline to 3-month, and to 6-month follow-up compared to the SCT. Hypothesis 1. The SCT+HABITS group will show greater increases in practice frequency and practice automaticity than SCT from baseline to 3-month, and to 6-month follow-up. Specific Aim 2: Determine whether SCT+HABITS, relative to SCT, will experience increased self-compassion and self-compassion automaticity, and reduced stress and psychopathology. Hypothesis 2. SCT+HABITS will promote greater increases in self-compassion and self-compassion automaticity, and greater reductions in stress and psychopathology from baseline to 3-month, to 6-month follow-up. Specific Aim 3: Assess whether greater baseline to 3-month follow-up increases in practice automaticity mediate the association between SCT+HABITS and baseline to 6-month follow-up increases in (a) self-compassion and (b) self-compassion automaticity, as well as reductions in (c) stress and (d) psychopathology. Hypothesis 3. Greater baseline to 3-month follow-up increases in practice automaticity will mediate the association between the SCT+HABITS group and baseline to 6-month follow-up increases in (a) self-compassion and (b) self-compassion automaticity, as well as reductions in (c) stress and (d) psychopathology. Exploratory Aim: Evaluate the barriers, facilitators, and acceptability of SCT+HABITS and SCT alone. This aim will be addressed via qualitative analyses to characterize barriers and facilitators to habit formation, and the proportion of participants in each condition (SCT+HABITS and SCT alone) who noted each type of barrier and facilitator. Participants will self-report on acceptability and feasibility via questionnaire. Then, the investigators will examine whether SCT+HABITS and SCT alone will meet or exceed the established criteria for acceptability and feasibility.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
497
Participants will be taught the micropractice (\<20-second/day personal practice) via video recording.
Participants will receive evidence-based tools for promoting habit-formation.
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, California, United States
Practice Frequency
Number of times practiced self-compassion exercise per week since last assessment. 1 item. Higher frequency indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and to 6-month followup
Practice Automaticity (Practice Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index [SRBAI])
4 items, 1-9 scale. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and to 6-month follow-up.
Self-Compassion (Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self Scale [SOCS-S])
20-items, 5-point response scale. Scores can range from 20 to 100 (Higher score means higher compassion for self). Sub-scale items included.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and to 6-month followup
Self-Compassion Automaticity (Self-Compassion Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index [SRBAI])
20 items. 1-9 scale. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and to 6-month followup.
Perceived Stress (Perceived-Stress Scale [PSS-10])
10 items, 5 point response scale (from 0 = Never to 4 = Very Often). Lower scores indicate a better outcome. Scoring: Reverse score (e.g., 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1 \& 4 = 0) items 4, 5, 7, \& 8 and then summing across all scale items.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and to 6-month followup
Psychopathology (DSM-5 Cross-Cutting Measure [DSM-XC])
22 items (suicidality item Q11 removed). 5-point scale (0=none or not at all; 1=slight or rare, less than a day or two; 2=mild or several days; 3=moderate or more than half the days; and 4=severe or nearly every day).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and to 6-month followup
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.