This prospective, multi-centre study aims to determine clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following surgical fixation of displaced mid-diaphyseal clavicle fractures and to compare implant removal rates between techniques within 2-years of the procedure.
Given the substantially lower implant removal rate in combination with a high union rate with the dual mini-fragment technique, we do not believe there is clinical equipoise required for a randomized clinical trial. This study is a multi-centre, prospective cohort study (11 sites confirmed to date) of all operatively treated clavicle fractures, in order to objectively evaluate all current surgical techniques used across Canada. This pragmatic approach will allow us to observe surgical decision-making, rationale for implant removal, and report on clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes for all techniques over a 2-year follow-up timeframe, for the first time. All enrolled patients will be encouraged to begin immediate range of motion as tolerated and weightbearing as tolerated post-operatively. This will be assessed at each follow-up and any reason for delayed motion or weightbearing will be reported.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
111
compare implant removal rates between surgical fixation techniques.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
RECRUITINGDetermine implant removal rates
To report implant removal rates in an appropriately powered prospective cohort study.
Time frame: 4 years
Identify rationale for implant removal
To report rationale for implant removal in an appropriately powered prospective cohort study.
Time frame: 4 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.