The goal of the Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is to collect safety and performance data on the commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid device. The study will learn about standard device use in adult patients who have a functional deltoid muscle and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the average improvement in patient-reported shoulder function after 2 years when compared to before the surgery, and * What is the rate of surgical revisions needed over a 10 year period Patients will be asked to will be asked to regularly attend their check-up visits with their surgeon (including having x-rays or CT images taken to check their shoulder and implant), to complete questionnaires to report how their shoulder is doing, and to tell their surgeon when they notice any changes.
The Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is a Global, single arm, multicenter, prospective, non-significant risk Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study, designed to collect safety and performance data on designated commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid. The objective of this multicenter study is to collect clinical data at baseline, surgery, immediate post-op, and annually through 10 years post-operation, on related clinical complications and clinical outcomes of market-approved Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid, to demonstrate safety and performance of these implants in a real-world setting. The primary outcome measure is the average improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score from baseline to 24 months. Secondary outcome measures include the following assessments to be evaluated throughout the patient's participation in the study: * Constant Score (years 1, 2, 5 and 10 only) * Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score * Patient Satisfaction * EQ-5D-5L Radiologic imaging: Patient images (X-ray or CT) completed at baseline and in-person follow-ups will be analyzed for standard radiographic findings, including, but not limited to: device migration, component breakage, radiolucencies and bone characteristics. Revision rate and survivorship will be assessed annually and at any time upon request for regulatory purposes such as PMCF or Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) updates. The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations will be reported as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survival. Adverse events will be evaluated from inclusion to last follow-up and will be documented during the study and categorized as whether they are serious and whether they are related to the Sponsor device or implant procedure. During the study, patients will undergo the following procedures, which are standard of care: * Patient information and Consent (as applicable per local regulation), * Inclusion/non-inclusion criteria, * Demography, Height \& Weight, * Surgical history and relevant medical history, * Physician exams (Range of Motion and Strength measurements), * Patient questionnaires (ASES, Constant, SANE, Patient Satisfaction, EQ-5D-5L), * Shoulder study implant \& surgery related data, * CT scans, x-rays * AE / SAE collection (continuous recording).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Device implant via reversed total shoulder arthroplasty
UCSF
San Francisco, California, United States
Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute OSU
Columbus, Ohio, United States
UT Southwestern
Frisco, Texas, United States
UT Health Science center - Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Carilion Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Performance: change in functional ability of the treated shoulder
The average change in functional ability as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. ASES is an absolute score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates better shoulder function.
Time frame: from baseline to 24 months
Safety: Revision rate and device survivorship
The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations
Time frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in level of pain and ability to carry out normal daily activities of the patient
Assessed via the Constant-Murley Shoulder score collected at baseline, years 1, 2, 5 and 10 and any other standard collection timepoint. In this score, 35 points are allocated for subjective assessments of pain and activities of daily living and 65 points are available for objective measures of rage of movement and shoulder strength. A score of 100 is a healthy shoulder.
Time frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in patient self-assessment of current status of their treated shoulder
Assessed via the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months, and annually. The rating is from 0% to 100% with 100% being normal.
Time frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in patient self-rated quality of life
Assessed via EQ-5D-5L Five Dimensions Quality of Life measurement general health questionnaire collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months and annually. Each dimension is measured on 5 levels from 1 being no problems to 5 being extreme problems.
Time frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in patient satisfaction with their shoulder
Satisfaction rating collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months and annually. Rating options are: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied, and Very Dissatisfied.
Time frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Safety: Adverse Event rate and assessments
Cumulative incidence of procedure and/or device related events (ADE, AESI, SAE, SADE)
Time frame: from date of treatment until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.