Comparison of Tele-rehabilitation Versus In-clinic Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Motor Function Stroke Patients

Superior University68 enrolled

Overview

To determine the effects of Tele-rehabilitation versus in-clinical rehabilitation for upper limb motor function and spasticity in chronic ischemic stroke patients.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

In-clinic RehabilitationDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Effects of In-clinic Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients

Tele-rehabilitationDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Effects of Tele-rehabilitation for Upper Limb Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 45 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * • Patients from both genders. * Patients with chronic ischemic stroke i.e. 6 months or more. * Patients with 45 years old and above. * On modified Ashworth scale, patient with limb spasticity equal to 2 or less than 2. * On Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), patients with good cognitive function minimum 24 or more. Exclusion Criteria: * • Patients with any recurrent stroke history. * Cognitive deficit patients (on Folstein Mini Mental state Examination score of less than 24) * Patient having other neurological diseases.

Locations (1)

Chaudary Muhammad Akram Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Fugal Myer assessment scale (FMAS)

Fugal Myer assessment scale (FMAS) to check the pain and funcationality in stroke

Time frame: 6 Months

Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to check the pain and funcationality in stroke

Time frame: 6 Months

Central Contacts

Hina Riaz, DPT

CONTACT

+923364795589 dptm-f18-168@superior.edu.pk

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.