Older sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients are at risk for receiving inequitable end-of-life care; those with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are at particularly high risk. Failure to collect and integrate sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data to identify patients' informal support systems may have adverse health consequences for SGM older adults, particularly for those dependent on informal caregivers to provide in-home support and assist with activities of daily living. The goal of this K01 is develop a novel training for hospice staff in person-centered communication that includes SOGI data collection to promote authentic end-of-life care for SGM patients and their caregivers.
Collecting representative and inclusive data about sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) is a critical component of combating the devastating health disparities affecting sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults. This is particularly crucial for patients living with ADRD, which is widely regarded as a family disease requiring the active caregiver involvement, particularly with advanced disease. Failure to collect and integrate SOGI data to identify patients' informal support systems may have adverse health consequences for SGM older adults, particularly for those dependent on informal caregivers to provide in-home support and assist with activities of daily living. Improper identification of chosen family and caregivers contributes to incomplete care delivery and disenfranchised grief. Given the historical discrimination experienced by older SGM people, adding SOGI questions without proper training has the potential to harm patients and create staff discomfort rather than foster inclusive interactions. For this career development award, I propose to characterize SOGI data collection challenges from patients and caregivers enrolling in hospice while exploring understudied intersections, such as SGM people living with ADRD, and how they affect staff approaches to delivering person-centered care. These insights will be used to develop and pilot test an intervention to train hospice interdisciplinary team (IDT) staff to sensitively collect and utilize SOGI data to improve communication with SGM patients and caregivers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the SGM communication intervention by hospice staff. I will pilot test the training with hospice staff to refine the content and delivery of the training. Outcomes in the pilot clinical trial will include feasibility, acceptability, and staff satisfaction with training.
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
RECRUITINGBarriers and facilitators to communicating with SGM older adults and perceptions and preferences for asking/disclosing SOGI
Evaluating barriers and facilitators to creating an affirming environment where SGM patients and their caregiver feel included and safe to disclose; perceptions and preferences for asking for/disclosing SOGI.
Time frame: Years 1-2
Content of training
Iteratively develop content areas with a focus on facilitating conversations with patients who are different than you.
Time frame: Years 2-3
Delivery of content
Determine acceptable, replicable, and scalability of content.
Time frame: Year 3-4
Feasibility and assessment of training
Evaluate feasibility of training intervention through simulation with standardized patients and hospice staff. Including evaluating content and delivery of the training and assess delivery of training, feasibility, comfort and confidence the training, incorporation into practice, and evaluation of content.
Time frame: Year 5
Sources of bias and stigma
Identify sources of stigma (anticipated, internalized, and experienced) and sources of bias (e.g. community, hospice staff, culture, policies).
Time frame: Years 1-2
Ongoing engagement around SOGI-informed care
Evaluate means for ongoing engagement of the SGM community for ongoing, authentic, training delivery.
Time frame: Years 2-3
Accessibility
Evaluate accessibility of training intervention ussing simulation with standardized patients and hospice staff, pilot test the training to refine the content and delivery of the training and assess accessibility and satisfaction with training.
Time frame: Years 3-5
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.