In this study, it is the procedure of spinal cord stimulation in Burst mode, its results and the experience of the patients that are evaluated.
There is 1 "classic" spinal cord stimulation setting that can be problematic in the case of cervical spinal cord stimulation because neck movements tend to trigger paresthesias. It is therefore possible, in a certain number of cases, that these side effects prevent the treatment from being effective. Thus, the development of new modes of spinal cord stimulation, mainly aiming at eliminating these side effects, has proven to be particularly interesting. There are 3 new modes of stimulation: high frequency stimulation which uses very short pulse durations and a stimulation frequency of the order of 1000 Hz, high density stimulation which uses long duration pulses and an intermediate stimulation frequency, and "Burst" stimulation which uses stimulation trains repeated 40 times per second. The Burst stimulation mode preferentially activates pathways in the medial part of the pain matrix, leading mainly to the cingulate cortex involved in modulating the affective, emotional and attentional side of pain. This result should theoretically be felt positively by the patient and his entourage, and the benefit should persist, or even improve with time, contrary to what is often observed with other stimulation modes. In addition, the Burst mode consumes little energy, theoretically less than conventional stimulation. It is therefore not necessary to use rechargeable stimulators, which provides greater comfort for the patient.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
30
Spinal cord stimulation is possible thanks to implantable spinal cord neurostimulators. These are medical devices, which include a stimulation electrode and an implantable box, designed to deliver electrical stimulation for pain relief. The electrode is implanted in the epidural space in order to stimulate the posterior cords of the spinal cord through the dura mater, at the dorsal or cervical level.
Clinique BRETECHE
Nantes, France
RECRUITINGPain assessment at 3 months after implant
The analgesic outcome of spinal cord stimulation will be assessed by comparing the preoperative visual analogue pain scales (VAS) (ranging from 0: "No pain" to 100: "Maximum pain imaginable") to those performed at the 3rd month visit (3 months). Patients with a VAS score of 50% or more improvement will be considered "improved". The VAS value retained corresponds to the average of 3 values taken during the day (morning, noon and evening).
Time frame: 3 months
procedure assesment
By using: \- VAS (ranging from 0: "No pain" to 100: "Maximum pain imaginable")
Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Assessing attention and working memory
By using: \- Trail Making Test (Reitan RM 1958) (2 parts A and B measured in seconds: The maximum score for part A is 100", 101" indicating that the test was not completed. The maximum score for Part B is 300", 301" indicating that the test was not completed)
Time frame: 3 months and 12 months
qualitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure
Semi-structured interviews with patients and their families oriented towards the evaluation of attention, affectivity and emotions.
Time frame: 3 months
Medication use
Medication quantification scale (MQS) (Harden RN 2005): ranging from 0 (no antalgic medication used) to 126 (maximum antalgic medication used)
Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
procedure assesment
By using: \- Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) (Mykletun A 2001) (2 columns ranging from 0 " no or few anxiety" to 21 "high anxiety"
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
procedure assesment
By using: \- Global Perceived Effect scale (GPE, Kamper SJ 2010) (ranging from 1 "very bad" to 7 "very good")
Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Assessing attention and working memory
By using: \- WAIS-IV (Benson N 2010) ( 4 subtests submited with 10 items in all (ranging 0 to 19 each), to calculate intelligence quotient with a minimum at 0 and a maximum at 190)
Time frame: 3 months and 12 months