This is a parallel group, Phase 3, 2-arm study for treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate dupilumab subcutaneous (SC) injections compared to placebo in Chinese adult participants with CRSwNP, on a background therapy with intranasal corticosteroids (budesonide nasal spray). Study details include: * The study duration will be up to 40 weeks. * The treatment duration will be up to 24 weeks. * The number of visits will be 7.
up to 40 weeks
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
63
solution for subcutaneous injection
solution for subcutaneous injection
nasal spray (suspension)
Investigational Site Number : 1560005
Beijing, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560001
Beijing, China
Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyps Score at Week 24
The NPS was the sum of the right and left nostril scores and assessed by central video recordings of bilateral nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size which ranged from 0: no polyps, 1: small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate, 2: polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate, 3: large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate, 4: large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores; ranged from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps). Higher scores indicated more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the last available value before randomization.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score (NCS) at Week 24
The NCS was a patient reported outcome to evaluate nasal congestion/obstruction, a major clinical symptom in chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype with nasal polyps. The NCS was assessed by the participant on a daily basis from visit 1 and throughout the study. It consisted of a 0 to 3 categorical scale, where 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms and 3: severe symptoms. Higher scores indicated more severity. The Week 24 analysis score was calculated as the average of all scores during the 4 weeks before Week 24. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to randomization.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Total Symptoms Score (TSS) at Week 24
The TSS was a reflective score of the worst symptom severity over the past 24 hours by the participant. It was assessed by the participant on a daily basis from visit 1 and throughout the study. It consisted of the sum of the following rhinosinusitis symptom questions: nasal congestion, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge); each assessed on 0 to 3 categorical scale, where 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms and 3: severe symptoms. The TSS was a composite score by summing the above symptom scores and ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicated greater overall symptom severity. The Week 24 analysis score was calculated as the average of all scores during the 4 weeks before Week 24. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to randomization.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigational Site Number : 1560010
Chengdu, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560014
Chongqing, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560022
Fuzhou, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560012
Guangzhou, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560011
Guangzhou, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560004
Hangzhou, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560006
Hefei, China
Investigational Site Number : 1560016
Jinan, China
...and 8 more locations
Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell at Week 24
The decreased/loss of sense of smell severity was a reflective score of the worst symptom severity over the past 24 hours. It was assessed by the participant on a daily basis from visit 1 and throughout the study, using an e-diary. It consisted of a 0 to 3 categorical scale, where 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms and 3: severe symptoms. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The Week 24 analysis score was calculated as the average of all scores during the 4 weeks before Week 24. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to randomization.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Total Score of 22-Items Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) at Week 24
The SNOT-22 was a validated 22-items questionnaire to assess the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with a recall period of 2 weeks. There were 5 domains that could be described within SNOT-22, including nasal, ear, sleep, general and practical, and emotional; each domain was scored on a 5-category scale which ranged from 0: no problem to 5: problem as bad as it can be. The total score was the sum of response to each of the 22 questions and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), higher scores indicated worse HRQoL. Baseline was defined as the last available value before randomization.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Received Systemic Corticosteroid (SCS) or Underwent Nasal Polyposis (NP) Surgery During the Study Treatment
SCS for rescue treatment of nasal polyps or for another reason were prescribed to the participant by the site. For participants who had a surgery or had a scheduled date for surgery for NP, the reason (worsening signs and/or symptoms during the study), the expected or actual surgery date, the type and outcome of surgery was recorded in a specific e-case report form page. Percentage of participants who received SCS or underwent NP surgery during the study treatment are presented.
Time frame: From randomization (Day 1) up to last dose of study treatment + 14 days, a maximum of 168 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TE period.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to last dose of study treatment + 98 days, a maximum of 252 days