The objective of this study was to identify potential prognostic factors of sacubitril/valsartan vs Valsartan treatment response.
Study will include 80 symptomatic patients with chronic HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III: Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) or group 2 received valsartan (target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment. Analysis of biochemical parameters, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and echocardiographic evaluation was performed at baseline and 6 months later. The primary outcome was the change in LVEF%, Lipo A, troponin I, NT-Pro BNP and neopterin levels. The secondary outcome is reporting efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs Valsartan use and the relationship between NYHA and EF and biomarkers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
80
Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.
group 2 received valsartan (N=40, target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.
Tanta University Hospital
Tanta, Elgarbia, Egypt
LVEF %
left ventricular ejection fraction percent
Time frame: 6 months
Lipo A (pg/ml)
Lipo protien A (pg/ml)
Time frame: 6 months
Troponin.I (ng/ml)
Troponin.I (ng/ml) biomarker
Time frame: 6 months
NT-Pro BNP
NT-pro BNP(pg/ml) biomarker
Time frame: 6 months
Neopterin (nmol/l)
Neopterin biomarker
Time frame: 6 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.