In dental implant restoration, available literature demonstrates the advantage of using tall abutments, with a change of diameter with respect to the implant and a conical internal connection in the abutment-implant gap. However, for multiple restorations, the abutment-prosthesis connection has not been studied in detail. The "multi-unit" systems, both standard and brand specific, have either a flat or butt joint or an cone. In any case, both are external connection systems. Recently, an internal-type abutment-prosthesis connection system has been developed. Although it is proving its usefulness in single restorations, its use in multiple restorations compared to traditional systems has not been studied. Therefore, taking into account all of the above, the present study has the overall objective of analyzing marginal bone loss (MBL) and adaptation of soft tissues by comparing a multiple prosthesis system of the "external, flat" type versus an external system of the "internal, conical" type.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Restoration of multiple implants with a Connect® abutment between the implant and the prosthesis.
Restoration of multiple implants with a conventional multi-unit abutment between the implant and the prosthesis.
Universidad de Granada
Granada, Spain
Marginal bone level
Peri-implant marginal bone level measured by standardized periapical radiography
Time frame: 1 year
Peri-implant microbiome
Relative abundance of microbial species in the peri-implant sulcus evaluated by next-generation sequencing methods
Time frame: 1 year
Peri-implant inflammation
Concentration of pro-inflammatory markers in the peri-implant sulcus evaluated by multiplex techniques methods
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.