It is hypothesized that significantly more patients would prefer oral decitabine/cedazuridine to subcutaneous (SC) azacitidine (AZA) due to several factors, including improved treatment convenience, the reduced risk of nosocomial infections, and reduced treatment discomfort. However, this hypothesis has not been formally studied in a controlled setting. This study aims to address this evidence gap and evaluate patient, primary caregiver (carer), and clinician treatment preference between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and SC AZA in the treatment of adult patients with International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) intermediate, IPSS intermediate-2, or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or low-blast (LB) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and thereby lend further credibility to the clinical, economic, and patient value of oral decitabine/cedazuridine.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
13
Subcutaneous azacitidine, 75mg/m2, 7 days
Oral decitabine 35mg/cedazuridine 100mg, once daily, 5 days
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Pindara Private Hospital
Benowa, Queensland, Australia
Townsville Hospital
Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Adelaide Oncology and Haematology
North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Grampian Health (Ballarat Base Hospital)
Ballarat Central, Victoria, Australia
Latrobe Regional Hospital
Traralgon, Victoria, Australia
Christchurch Hospital
Christchurch, New Zealand
Dunedin Hospital
Dunedin, New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital
Grafton, New Zealand
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, New Zealand
...and 1 more locations
Proportion of patients reporting preference for oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine on the patient treatment preference in myelodysplasia questionnaire (pTPMQ)
Time frame: Prior to initiation of Cycle 3 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of patients reporting preference for oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine on the pTPMQ
Time frame: Prior to initiation of Cycle 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of carers reporting preference for oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine on the carer treatment preference in myelodysplasia questionnaire (cTPMQ)
Time frame: Prior to initiation of Cycle 3 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of carers reporting preference for oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine on the cTPMQ
Time frame: Prior to initiation of Cycle 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of clinicians reporting preference for oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine on the medical treatment preference in myelodysplasia questionnaire (mTPMQ)
Time frame: Prior to initiation of Cycle 4 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of clinicians reporting preference for oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine on the mTPMQ
Time frame: End of Study (EOS) Day 28
Proportion of clinicians choosing oral decitabine/cedazuridine vs subcutaneous azacitidine for continuation of treatment and reasons for the treatment choice based on the mTPMQ
Time frame: Cycle 5, Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EQ-5D-5L in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EQ-5D-5L in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 3, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 3, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and Subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EQ-5D-5L in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 4, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and Subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 4, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EQ-5D-5L in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 5, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 5, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EQ-5D-5L in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 6, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
Difference in quality of life between oral decitabine/cedazuridine and subcutaneous azacitidine as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients
Time frame: Cycle 6, Day 5 (each cycle is 28 days)
The difference in the incidence of treatment discontinuation and reasons for treatment discontinuation
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) through to study completion (up to 6 cycles of treatment where each cycle is 28 days)
Incidence and severity of adverse events upon study physician discretion.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) through to study completion (up to 6 cycles of treatment where each cycle is 28 days)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.