This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in the management of Meralgia Paresthetica (MP), a peripheral neuropathy causing pain, numbness, and tingling in the thigh region. Participants with MP will be randomly allocated to either the HILT or sham HILT (control) group. The study will evaluate the effects of HILT on pain intensity, functional outcomes, and quality of life. Findings from this trial will provide insights into the potential benefits of HILT as a non-invasive and safe treatment option for patients with MP.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
62
Participants will undergo HILT treatment using a diode laser device (wavelength: 1064 nm; power: 12 W; peak power: 50 W; energy density: 600 J/cm²; spot size: 1 cm²; pulse duration: 200 μs; pulse frequency: 10 Hz) applied in continuous mode. The laser probe will make contact with the skin over the LFCN entrapment site at three specific points: (a) the inguinal ligament, (b) the point of maximum tenderness along the nerve pathway, and (c) the mid-point between the ASIS and the lateral border of the patella. Each point will be treated for 1 minute and 40 seconds, totaling a 5-minute session. Participants will undergo 12 sessions in total, with three sessions per week for four weeks.
Participants will undergo sham HILT treatment using an identical laser device with no active laser output, following the same treatment protocol as the HILT group. The laser probe will make contact with the skin over the LFCN entrapment site at the same three specific points as the HILT group. Each point will be treated for 1 minute and 40 seconds, totaling a 5-minute session. Participants will undergo 12 sessions in total, with three sessions per week for four weeks.
Outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Ahram Canadian University
Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Changes in Pain Intensity
The secondary outcome measure is the change in pain intensity, assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a self-reported scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A reduction in NPRS scores indicates a decrease in pain intensity.
Time frame: Changes measured at Baseline, immediately post-treatment (4 weeks), and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups
Changes in Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Distal Latency
the change in distal latency of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), assessed using nerve conduction studies. The distal latency represents the time it takes for an electrical impulse to travel along the nerve to the recording electrode. Reduced distal latency indicates improved nerve conduction and function.
Time frame: Changes measured at Baseline, immediately post-treatment (4 weeks), and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups
Changes in Functional Outcomes
The secondary outcome measure is the change in functional outcomes, assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a self-reported questionnaire measuring the level of disability due to lower back and leg pain. Lower RMDQ scores indicate better functional outcomes and less disability.
Time frame: Changes measured at Baseline, immediately post-treatment (4 weeks), and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups
Changes in Quality of Life
The secondary outcome measure is the change in quality of life, assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), a self-reported questionnaire evaluating overall health and well-being across eight domains. Higher SF-36 scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Changes measured at Baseline, immediately post-treatment (4 weeks), and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.