There is an increased lack of short- and long-term real-life effectiveness and safety data on new oral antivirals authorised and commercialised to treat COVID-19. To date, only two clinical trials have been published with data on the efficacy and safety of the use of the Paxlovid® and Lagevrio®. Since there is a public health, political, social and economic pressure to prevent severity, hospitalisation and death from COVID-19, monitoring the effectiveness and safety of commercialised oral antiviral therapies against COVID-19 has become emergent pharmacovigilance and public health task. The objective of the study is to monitor the post-marketing safety and effectiveness of the new oral antivirals indicated for the treatment of COVID-19, namely Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid®) and Molnupiravir (Lagevrio®), having as holders of the Authorization of Market introduction to Pfizer Europe MA EEIG and Merck Sharp \& Dohme B.V., respectively.
There is an increased lack of short- and long-term real-life effectiveness and safety data on new oral antivirals authorised and commercialised to treat COVID-19. To date, only two clinical trials have been published with data on the efficacy and safety of the use of the Paxlovid® and Lagevrio®. Since there is a public health, political, social and economic pressure to prevent severity, hospitalisation and death from COVID-19, monitoring the effectiveness and safety of commercialised oral antiviral therapies against COVID-19 has become emergent pharmacovigilance and public health task6. A real-life cohort event monitoring system allows for the monitoring of newly introduced oral antivirals, in addition to existing spontaneous reporting systems and healthcare database studies (i.e., secondary data), as it is complementary to these systems in several ways. First, it is better suited to capture the more frequent AE, including those that are not medically attended. It generates more comprehensive safety data, e.g. on disease course and the impact of the AE. Moreover, there is insufficient data on these new medicines in real clinical practice, particularly from large-scale studies on the long-term efficacy or safety. This work, with scientific and academic interest but, essentially, clinical and regulatory importance, constitutes a duty of the regional pharmacovigilance units. As such, it is also an obligation of the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Commissions, based on the legislation in force, to "collaborate in studies to monitor the safety and effectiveness of medicines promoted in the context of the National Pharmacovigilance System".
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
211
Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir
Molnupiravir
Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, EPE
Açores, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, EPE
Lisbon, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, EPE
Porto, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, EPE
Porto, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, EPE
Porto, Portugal
Unidade de Saúde Familiar - Homem do Leme (ACES Porto Ocidental)
Porto, Portugal
Safety outcome
The incidence of AE (with particular focus on AE of special interest) that emerge during or after the treatment period, serious AE, and AE leading to discontinuation of the treatment, as coded according to the MedDRA. Incidence data will be provided for each treatment group within the safety analysis population, including all patients who received at least one drug dose. The occurrence of AE will be asked in open question / unsolicited. For each reported AE, date of onset, outcome, duration of symptoms (if recovered), and severity/impact of the symptoms (including medical assistance \& hospitalisation) will be asked.
Time frame: 6 days after onset treatment for both drugs.
Safety outcome
The incidence of AE (with particular focus on AE of special interest) that emerge during or after the treatment period, serious AE, and AE leading to discontinuation of the treatment, as coded according to the MedDRA. Incidence data will be provided for each treatment group within the safety analysis population, including all patients who received at least one drug dose. The occurrence of AE will be asked in open question / unsolicited. For each reported AE, date of onset, outcome, duration of symptoms (if recovered), and severity/impact of the symptoms (including medical assistance \& hospitalisation) will be asked.
Time frame: 39 days after treatment onset for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir cohort.
Safety outcome
The incidence of AE (with particular focus on AE of special interest) that emerge during or after the treatment period, serious AE, and AE leading to discontinuation of the treatment, as coded according to the MedDRA. Incidence data will be provided for each treatment group within the safety analysis population, including all patients who received at least one drug dose. The occurrence of AE will be asked in open question / unsolicited. For each reported AE, date of onset, outcome, duration of symptoms (if recovered), and severity/impact of the symptoms (including medical assistance \& hospitalisation) will be asked.
Time frame: 19 days after treatment onset for molnupiravir cohort.
Effectiveness outcome
The incidence of hospitalisation for any cause (defined as ≥24 hours of acute care in a hospital or any similar facility) or death for any cause through day 29.
Time frame: 29 days after treatment onset for both drugs.
Adherence to treatment
Will be measured using the self-reported 7-item Measure Treatment Adherence (MTA) tool validated for the Portuguese Population. The MTA is a psychometric tool derived from the Morisky et al. questionnaire and evaluates the individuals' behaviour concerning the daily use of medication.
Time frame: 6 days after onset treatment for both drugs.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.