This study will assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, maintenance of virological suppression and patient reported outcomes for participants receiving CAB and RPV LA injections following SC administration in the anterior abdominal wall SC tissue compared with IM administration in the gluteus medius muscle in adult participants living with HIV-1 infection in the FLAIR study (NCT02938520).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
94
It is a sterile white to slightly pink suspension containing 200 mg/mL of CAB as free acid for administration by intramuscular (IM) injection. Each vial is for single-dose use containing a withdrawable volume of 2.0 mL, and does not require dilution prior to administration. CAB LA is composed of cabotegravir free acid, polysorbate 20, polyethylene glycol 3350, mannitol, and water for injection.
It is a sterile white suspension containing 300 mg/mL of RPV as the free base. The route of administration is by intramuscular (IM) injection. Each vial contains a nominal fill of 2.0 mL, and does not require dilution prior to administration. RPV LA requires refrigeration and must be protected from light. RPV LA is composed of RPV free base, poloxamer 338, sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate, citric acid monohydrate, glucose monohydrate, sodium hydroxide, water for injection.
GSK Investigational Site
Macon, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Bellaire, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
GSK Investigational Site
Wentworth, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
...and 20 more locations
Concentrations at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of CAB LA 400 mg Following Administration CAB LA + RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis.
Time frame: At screening Week-4; Day 1, Week 4, Week 8 for SC injections; and Week 12 for Return to IM gluteal injection
Ctau of RPV LA 600 mg Following Administration of CAB LA + RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis.
Time frame: At screening Week-4; Day 1, Week 4, Week 8 for SC abdominal injections; and Week 12 for Return to IM gluteal injection
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) One Week Post Dose of CAB LA 400 mg Following Administration of CAB LA + RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis.
Time frame: At screening week -3; Week 1, Week 5, Week 9 for SC abdominal injections; and Week 13 for Return to IM gluteal injection
Cmax One Week Post Dose of RPV LA 600 mg Following Administration of CAB LA + RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis.
Time frame: At screening Week -3; Week 1, Week 5, Week 9 for SC abdominal injections; and Week 13 for Return to IM gluteal injection
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 Through the End of Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of CAB LA 400 mg Following Administration of CAB LA + RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis.
Time frame: At screening Week-4; Day 1, Week 4, Week 8 for SC abdominal injections; and Week 12, for Return to IM gluteal injection
AUC[0-tau] of RPV LA 600 mg Following Administration of CAB LA + RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis.
Time frame: At screening Week-4; Day 1, Week 4, Week 8 for SC abdominal injections; and Week 12 for Return to IM gluteal injection
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions (ISRs) and by Maximum Severity - SC Injection Phase
Severity of ISRs was analyzed using division of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (DAIDS) grading scale. The severity is categorized into grades as following: Grade 1 - mild, Grade 2 - moderate, Grade 3 - severe, Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening, Grade 5 - Death. Higher grade indicates more severe condition.
Time frame: From Day 1 Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Based on Maximum Severity Grade - SC Injection Phase
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Severity of AESI was analyzed using DAIDS grading scale. The severity is categorized into grades as following: Grade 1 - mild, Grade 2 - moderate, Grade 3 - severe, Grade 4 - Potentially life threatening, Grade 5 - Death. Higher grade indicates more severe condition. AESI assessed were Depression, Anxiety, Impact on creatinine, Hyperglycaemia.
Time frame: From Day 1 Up to Week 12
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to ISRs and AESIs - SC Injection Phase
Time frame: From Day 1 Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) From the Last IM Gluteal Injection in Screening Phase to the End of the SC Injection Phase
SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations which involved medical or scientific judgment or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. SAEs are subset of AEs.
Time frame: From Week -4 Up to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Following Administration of SC Injection: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Creatine Phosphokinase
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Blood samples were collected as assessed by protocol, at specific time points for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Change from Baseline value is presented and was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Following Administration of SC Injection: Creatinine, Total Bilirubin
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Following Administration of SC Injection: Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide, Chloride, Phosphate
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Following Administration of SC Injection: Albumin
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Following Administration of SC Injection: Lipase
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Following Administration of SC Injection: Creatinine Clearance
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Panels Following Administration of SC Injection: Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, Triglycerides
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Following Administration of SC Injection: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelet Count
Blood samples were collected as assessed by protocol, at specific time points for the analysis of hematology parameters. Change from Baseline value is presented and was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Following Administration of SC Injection: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Following Administration of SC Injection: Hemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Following Administration of SC Injection: Hematocrit
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Following Administration of SC Injection: Mean Corpuscular Volume
Time frame: Baseline (screening Week -4), Change from baseline (CFB) at Week 4, CFB at Week 8, and CFB at Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than (<) 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Algorithm - SC Injection Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV RNA Greater Than Equal to (>=) 50 c/mL as Per FDA Snapshot Algorithm - SC Injection Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 8, 12
Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) of >=200 c/mL - SC Injection Phase
Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. CVF was defined as rebound as indicated by two consecutive plasma HIV-1-RNA levels \>=200 c/mL after prior suppression to \<200 c/mL.
Time frame: From Day 1 Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Phenotypic Resistance - SC Injection Phase
Plasma samples were collected for drug resistance testing. Number of participants who met CVF criteria (two consecutive plasma HIV-1-RNA levels \>=200 copies/mL after prior suppression to \<200 copies/mL) with treatment emergent phenotypic resistance were reported.
Time frame: From Day 1 Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Genotypic Resistance - SC Injection Phase
Plasma samples were collected for drug resistance testing. Number of participants who met CVF criteria (two consecutive plasma HIV-1-RNA levels \>=200 copies/mL after prior suppression to \<200 copies/mL) with treatment emergent genotypic resistance were reported.
Time frame: From Day 1 Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Post-injection Pain Assessment Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on Week-3 - Screening/IM Gluteal Injection Phase
A numeric rating scale was used to assess the level of pain experienced following injections with CAB + RPV. The scale contains one item and the response scale is ranging from 0= "no pain" to 10= "extreme pain". NRS questionnaire included the question regarding the maximum level of pain experienced with the most recent injections. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: Week -3 (Baseline)
Number of Participants With Post-injection Pain Assessment Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on Week 1 - SC Injection Phase
A numeric rating scale was used to assess the level of pain experienced following injections with CAB + RPV. The scale contains one item and the response scale is ranging from 0= "no pain" to 10= "extreme pain". NRS questionnaire included the question regarding the maximum level of pain experienced with the most recent injections. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: Day 1
Number of Participants With Post-injection Pain Assessment Using NRS on Week 9- SC Injection Phase
A numeric rating scale was used to assess the level of pain experienced following injections with CAB + RPV. The scale contains one item and the response scale is ranging from 0= "no pain" to 10= "extreme pain". NRS questionnaire included the questions regarding the maximum level of pain experienced with the most recent injections. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: Week 9
Number of Participants With Post-injection Pain Assessment Using NRS on Week 13- Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
A numeric rating scale was used to assess the level of pain experienced following injections with CAB + RPV. The scale contains one item and the response scale is ranging from 0= "no pain" to 10= "extreme pain". NRS questionnaire included the questions regarding the maximum level of pain experienced with the most recent injections. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: Week 13
HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Status Version (HIVTSQs) Total Score -Screening/IM Gluteal Injection Phase
HIVTSQ is a self-completion measure specifically designed to measure treatment satisfaction in HIV participants. HIVTSQs questionnaire includes 12 questions and the total treatment satisfaction score is computed with items 1-11 and summed to produce a total score with a possible range of 0 to 66. Higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction and a lower score indicates dissatisfaction.
Time frame: Week -3 (Baseline)
HIVTSQs Total Score -SC Injection Phase
HIVTSQ is a self-completion measure specifically designed to measure treatment satisfaction in HIV participants. HIVTSQs questionnaire includes 12 questions and the total treatment satisfaction score is computed with items 1-11 and summed to produce a total score with a possible range of 0 to 66. Higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction and a lower score indicates dissatisfaction.
Time frame: At Week 9
HIVTSQs Total Score -Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
HIVTSQ is a self-completion measure specifically designed to measure treatment satisfaction in HIV participants. HIVTSQs questionnaire includes 12 questions and the total treatment satisfaction score is computed with items 1-11 and summed to produce a total score with a possible range of 0 to 66. Higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction and a lower score indicates dissatisfaction.
Time frame: At Week 17
Change From Baseline in HIVTSQs Individual Item Scores at Indicated Time Points -SC Injection Phase
HIVTSQs is a 12-item questionnaire and individual item scores on HIVTSQs scale are rated as 6 (very satisfied) to 0 (very dissatisfied). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. Data was reported for each treatment satisfaction item based on the following items: Item 1=satisfaction with current treatment, Item 2=level of HIV control based on treatment, Item 3=any side effects of present treatment, Item 4=demands made by current treatment, Item 5=convenience in finding treatment, Item 6=flexibility in finding treatment, Item 7=understanding HIV, Item 8=extent to which the treatment fits in with lifestyle, Item 9=recommendation of present treatment to someone else, Item 10=continuation with present form of treatment, Item 11=easy or difficult treatment, Item 12=amount of discomfort/pain involved with present form of treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (Week -3) and up to Week 9
Change From Baseline in HIVTSQs Individual Item Scores at Indicated Time Points - Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
HIVTSQs is a 12-item questionnaire and individual item scores on HIVTSQs scale are rated as 6 (very satisfied) to 0 (very dissatisfied). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. Data was reported for each treatment satisfaction item based on the following items: Item 1=satisfaction with current treatment, Item 2=level of HIV control based on treatment, Item 3=any side effects of present treatment, Item 4=demands made by current treatment, Item 5=convenience in finding treatment, Item 6=flexibility in finding treatment, Item 7=understanding HIV, Item 8=extent to which the treatment fits in with lifestyle, Item 9=recommendation of present treatment to someone else, Item 10=continuation with present form of treatment, Item 11=easy or difficult treatment, Item 12=amount of discomfort/pain involved with present form of treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (Week -3) and up to Week 17
Change From Study Week 9 to Study Week 17 in HIVTSQs Individual Item Scores at Indicated Time Points - Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
HIVTSQs is a 12-item questionnaire and individual item scores on HIVTSQs scale are rated as 6 (very satisfied) to 0 (very dissatisfied). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. Data was reported for each treatment satisfaction item based on the following items: Item 1=satisfaction with current treatment, Item 2=level of HIV control based on treatment, Item 3=any side effects of present treatment, Item 4=demands made by current treatment, Item 5=convenience in finding treatment, Item 6=flexibility in finding treatment, Item 7=understanding HIV, Item 8=extent to which the treatment fits in with lifestyle, Item 9=recommendation of present treatment to someone else, Item 10=continuation with present form of treatment, Item 11=easy or difficult treatment, Item 12=amount of discomfort/pain involved with present form of treatment.
Time frame: Week 9 and Week 17
HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Change Version (HIVTSQc) Individual Item Score at Indicated Time Points -SC Injection Phase
HIVTSQc is a 12-item questionnaire to measure treatment satisfaction in HIV participants. Individual items were rated as +3 (much more satisfied) to -3(much less satisfied). Higher the score, greater the improvement in satisfaction with each aspect of treatment and lower the score, greater the deterioration in satisfaction with each aspect of treatment. Data was reported for each treatment satisfaction item based on the following items:Item 1=satisfaction with current treatment,Item2=level of HIV control based on treatment,Item3=any side effects of present treatment,Item4=demands made by current treatment,Item 5=convenience in finding treatment,Item 6=flexibility in finding treatment,Item 7=understanding HIV,Item 8=extent to which the treatment fits in with lifestyle,Item 9=recommendation of present treatment to someone else,Item 10=continuation with present form of treatment,Item 11=easy or difficult treatment,Item 12=amount of discomfort/pain involved with present form of treatment.
Time frame: From Week -4 up to Week 9
HIVTSQc Total Score at Indicated Time Points -SC Injection Phase
HIVTSQ is a self-completion measure specifically designed to measure treatment satisfaction in HIV participants. Total treatment satisfaction change score is computed using items 1 to 11 and are summed to produce a score with a possible range of -33 to 33. Higher the score, greater the improvement in satisfaction with treatment; the lower the score, the greater the deterioration in satisfaction with treatment. A score of 0 represented no change.
Time frame: From Week -4 up to Week 9
Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire in Domain Scores and Individual Item Scores- Screening/IM Gluteal Injection Phase
The PIN questionnaire is characterized by the dimension scores based on 4 domains including Bother from injection site reactions (ISRs), Acceptability, Leg movement and Sleep categories. The objective of this endpoint is to present analysis of 2 (out of 4) PIN domains: Bother from ISRs and Acceptability. This questionnaire contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Domain scores were calculated as a mean of all items with the domain. Scores range from 1 to 5,and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favorable perception of vaccination, and 5 the most unfavorable. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: At Week -3 (Baseline)
PIN Questionnaire in Domain Scores and Individual Item Scores at Indicated Time Points - SC Injection Phase
The PIN questionnaire is characterized by the dimension scores based on 4 domains including Bother from injection site reactions (ISRs), Acceptability, Leg movement and Sleep categories. The objective of this endpoint is to present analysis of 2 (out of 4) PIN domains: Bother from ISRs and Acceptability. This questionnaire contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Domain scores were calculated as a mean of all items with the domain. Scores range from 1 to 5,and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favorable perception of vaccination, and 5 the most unfavorable. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: At Week 1 and Week 9
PIN Questionnaire in Domain Scores and Individual Item Scores - Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
The PIN questionnaire is characterized by the dimension scores based on 4 domains including Bother from injection site reactions (ISRs), Acceptability, Leg movement and Sleep categories. The objective of this endpoint is to present analysis of 2 (out of 4) PIN domains: Bother from ISRs and Acceptability. This questionnaire contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Domain scores were calculated as a mean of all items with the domain. Scores range from 1 to 5,and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favorable perception of vaccination, and 5 the most unfavorable. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: At Week 13
Change From Baseline to the PIN Questionnaire in Domain Scores and Individual Item Scores at Indicated Time Points - SC Injection Phase
The PIN questionnaire is characterized by the dimension scores based on 4 domains including Bother from injection site reactions (ISRs), Acceptability, Leg movement and Sleep categories. The objective of this endpoint is to present analysis of 2 (out of 4) PIN domains: Bother from ISRs and Acceptability. This questionnaire contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Domain scores were calculated as a mean of all items with the domain. Scores range from 1 to 5,and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favorable perception of vaccination, and 5 the most unfavorable. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: Change from Baseline (Week -3) at Week 1 and Week 9
Change From Baseline to the PIN Questionnaire in Domain Scores and Individual Item Scores at Indicated Time Points - Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
The PIN questionnaire is characterized by the dimension scores based on 4 domains including Bother from injection site reactions (ISRs), Acceptability, Leg movement and Sleep categories. The objective of this endpoint is to present analysis of 2 (out of 4) PIN domains: Bother from ISRs and Acceptability. This questionnaire contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Domain scores were calculated as a mean of all items with the domain. Scores range from 1 to 5,and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favorable perception of vaccination, and 5 the most unfavorable. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. The objective of this outcome measure was to present the data separately for each treatment received (CAB, RPV).
Time frame: Change from Baseline (Week -3) at Week 13
Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire on Week 9 - SC Injection Phase
A preference questionnaire was used to assess participant's preference for the subcutaneous injections compared with the gluteal injections. The "Preference" questionnaire included a single item question evaluating preference of HIV treatment. Participants were required to provide their response to Question, which stated "Which injection site do you prefer". The responses included Intramuscular Injections in the buttock, Subcutaneous Injections in the Abdomen and No preference.
Time frame: Up to Week 9
Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire on Week 17 - Return to IM Gluteal Injection Phase
A preference questionnaire was used to assess participant's preference for the subcutaneous injections compared with the gluteal injections. The "Preference" questionnaire included a single item question evaluating preference of HIV treatment. Participants were required to provide their response to Question, which stated "Which injection site do you prefer". The responses included Intramuscular Injections in the buttock, Subcutaneous Injections in the Abdomen and No preference.
Time frame: Up to Week 17