In HIV-infected people with metabolic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis of any degree, as measured by non-invasive testing, antiretroviral treatment that includes rilpivinire for 18 months results in a slowing of progression and/or reduction of fatty metabolic liver disease, attenuating inflammation and liver fibrosis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
63
DTG/RPV will be administered in combination as 50/25 mg/day tablets or separately as DTG 50 mg/d tablets together with RPV 25 mg/d tablets. There will be no problem if during the course of the study the patient is switched from the combined form to the separate form and vice versa as long as the HAART (Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy) components are respected.
TDF 245 mg/d or TAF 25mg/d together with FTC 200 mg/d and RPV 25 mg/d. They may be administered as single tablets or in combination forms where one tablet contains TDF/TAF and FTC and another RPV tablet. There will be no problem if during the course of the study the patient is switched from the combined form to the separate form and vice versa as long as the HAART components are respected.
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, Spain
Hospital universitario Infanta Leonor
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) as part of the antiretroviral treatment regimen in VIH-infected people, to slow the progression and/or reduce liver fibrosis of any degree
To measure the no progression and/or regression of liver fibrosis: No change in liver stiffness as measured by ET (Transient Elastography) or FIB4 at the 18-month visit with respect to the baseline, the intervention group (branches 1 and 2) compared to the control group.
Time frame: 18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) as part of the antiretroviral treatment regimen in VIH-infected people, to slow the progression and/or reduce liver fibrosis of any degree
Reduction in liver stiffness measured by ET or FIB4 at the 18-month visit from baseline in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group.
Time frame: 18 months
Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade
To evaluate the efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade, as measured by non-invasive tests, in HIV-infected people: * as part of a nucleoside analogue-free antiretroviral treatment regimen * as part of an antiretroviral treatment regimen that includes tenofovir Proportion of subjects with ET measurement \< 5.2 kPa in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade
Proportion of subjects with a FIB4 measurement \< 1.3 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade
The mean reduction in the APRI measure in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patients who are randomised to this treatment arm will continue with the HAART they were receiving prior to signing the informed consent. As in arms 1 and 2, a change in the form of HAART administration (from a combined to a separate form and vice versa) will be allowed as long as the HAART components are respected.
Time frame: 12-18 months
Efficacy of RPV in reducing liver fibrosis of any grade
Proportion of subjects with an APRI measure \< 0.5 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
The mean reduction in the percentage of liver fat, measured by magnetic resonance imaging, which measures the proton density fraction of fat (MRI-PDFF), between the beginning and the end of the study comparing the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) vs control group
Time frame: 18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
Difference in the proportion of responders between the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) at 18 months from the start of treatment, defined as those who achieve \>30% reduction in hepatic steatosis measured by MRI-PDFF
Time frame: 18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as MRI-PDFF \> 5% steatosis in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 18 months from the start of treatment
Time frame: 18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
The mean reduction of the CAP measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
The mean reduction in the FLI measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
The mean reduction in the HSI measure in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
The mean reduction of the TyG measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as CAP \> 238 dB/m in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
The mean reduction in the FLI measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as HSI score \> 36 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to reduce hepatic steatosis
Proportion of subjects with hepatic steatosis measured as TyG score \> 8.38 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
The mean reduction of the HOMA-IR value in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
Difference in the proportion of subjects with insulin resistance, measured as HOMA-IR \>2.5 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
Mean reduction in TyG (IR) measurement in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
Difference in the proportion of subjects with insulin resistance measured as TyG \> 4.68 in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
The mean reduction in fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
Difference in the proportion of subjects with fasting glycemia \> 100 mg/dL in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the insulin resistance
The reduction in the measurement of abdominal circumference and waist ratio/in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatmen
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
The mean reduction in fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
Difference in the proportion of subjects with hypertriglyceridemia (value \> 150 mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
Mean reduction in fasting LDL cholesterol quantification (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
Difference in the proportion of subjects with elevated LDL cholesterol (value \> 130 mg/dL and value \>100 mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months of start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
The mean increase in fasting HDL cholesterol quantification (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
Difference in the proportion of subjects with elevated HDL cholesterol (value \> 45 mg/dL in men and value \> 50 mg/dL in women) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months from the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
The mean reduction in fasting non-LDL cholesterol quantification (mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to improve the lipid metabolism
Difference in the proportion of subjects with elevated non-LDL cholesterol (value \> 160 mg/dL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the liver inflammation
The mean change in ALT value (IU/mL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) vs. the control group at 12 and 18 months from baseline
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the liver inflammation
The mean change in AST value (IU/mL) in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) versus the control group at 12 and 18 months from the baseline visit
Time frame: 12-18 months
To evaluate the efficacy of Rilpivirine (RPV) to decrease the liver inflammation.
The change of the gene expression value of: IL1-beta, IL6, IL10, MCP1, PAI-1, TGF-alpha, TNF-alpha in PBMCs in the intervention group (arms 1 and 2) compared to the control group at 12 and 18 months compared to the baseline visit.
Time frame: 12-18 months
Efficacy of RPV to reduce hepatic steatosis/fibrosis.
To assess the efficacy of RPV as part of the antiretroviral treatment regimen in HIV-infected individuals to reduce hepatic steatosis/fibrosis based on the presence of PNPLA3 and MBOAT7-TMC4 genetic polymorphisms.
Time frame: 18 months
To characterise the effects of RPV on the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells
. Analyse the gene expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic markers in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear cells by RT-PCR: IL1-gamma, IL6, IL10, MCP1, P AI-1, TGF-beta, TNF-alpha.
Time frame: 18 months
To characterise the effects of RPV on the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells
. Measurement of ALT, AST and GGT in plasma as markers of inflammation.
Time frame: 18 months
Efficacy of RPV to reduce the progression to steatohepatitis
In previous studies it has shown that PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and MBOAT7-TMC4 polymorphisms are associated with elevated ALT levels and histologic parameters of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis severity. On the baseline visit will be collected biological samples for genetuic study. A 3 ml blood sample will be drawn into an EDTA tube at baseline visit for determination of PNPLA3 (C, G alleles) and MBOAT7-TMC4 (G, A alleles) genetic polymorphisms.
Time frame: 18 months