A Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study to evaluate the effects of the intraperitoneal, liposomal formulation VS-01 in patients with an acute episode of hepatic and/or extrahepatic organ dysfunctions and failures in the presence of liver cirrhosis (Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure, ACLF) and accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity (ascites)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Patients will receive VS-01 intraperitoneally on four consecutive days on top of SOC
Patients will receive SOC for decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF
Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-C) ACLF Score at Day 7
The CLIF-C ACLF score is derived from the CLIF-C organ failure (OF) score. The formula for the CLIF-C ACLF score is CLIF-ACLF = 10\*\[0.33\*CLIF-C OF + 0.04\*Age + 0.63\*Ln(white cell count) -2\]. The CLIF-C ACLF score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score indicated a greater mortality risk.
Time frame: Day 7
Number of Deaths From Day 1 to Day 90
90-Day mortality was reported as the number of deaths from Day 1 to Day 90.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 90
Number of Deaths From Day 1 to Day 28
28-Day mortality was reported as the number of deaths from Day 1 to Day 28.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 28
Time to Death Through Day 90
Time to death was calculated as death date - treatment start date. Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 90 were censored. The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 90
Number of Participants With ACLF Resolution
ACLF resolution was defined as ACLF grade 'No ACLF', for participants who had ACLF at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 and Day 28
Time to ACLF Resolution Through Day 28
ACLF resolution was defined as ACLF grade 'No ACLF', for participants who had ACLF at Baseline. Time to ACLF resolution was calculated as (ACLF resolution date - treatment start date). Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 28 were censored at min\[trial discontinuation date; Day 28 visit date or treatment start date +27 if no visit date; last contact/assessment date for participant lost to follow-up; date of liver transplant or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)\]. The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
University of Missouri Health Care
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/ New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
...and 16 more locations
Time frame: Baseline to Day 28
Number of Participants With ≥ 1 ACLF Grade Regression
ACLF regression was defined as regression of at least one full grade.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 7 and Day 28
Time to ≥ 1 ACLF Grade Regression Through Day 28
Time to ACLF ≥ 1 grade regression was calculated as (ACLF ≥ 1 grade regression date - treatment start date). Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 28 were censored. The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 28
Secondary: Time to Transplant or Death Through Day 90
Time to transplant was calculated as (transplant or death date - treatment start date). Participants who were not observed to have encountered the event through Day 90 were censored. The inter-quartile range was obtained via Kaplan Meier estimation.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 90
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after at least one dose of the study drug had been administered, even if the event was not considered to be related to the study drug. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical event that occurs at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event.
Time frame: Up to Day 90