The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate the optimal supportive treatment of bronchiolitis in infants from 0-12 months of age. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * To investigate whether isotonic saline should be used as supportive treatment for children with bronchiolitis, and if so, identify the optimal route of administration. The primary outcome is duration of hospitalization. * To investigate the current epidemiology of the viral pathogens causing bronchitis in children in Denmark, and to assess whether children infected with specific pathogens might benefit from treatment with isotonic saline. The children are randomized after inclusion through computer randomization to one of the 3 arms in the study: 1. Nebulized isotonic saline 2. Nasal irrigation with isotonic saline 3. No treatment with saline The investigators will compare treatment with saline (both methods) with no treatment, and the investigators will also compare the two methods of delivery of saline (nebulized vs. nasal irrigation).
Design: An investigator-initiated, multicenter, open label, three-arm randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. Study sites: Seven pediatric departments in eastern Denmark (Slagelse Hospital, Holbæk Hospital, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Nordsjaellands Hospital, and Nykoebing Falster Hospital). Participants: Children aged 0-12 months admitted to a pediatric department or emergency department in eastern Denmark with bronchiolitis, whose parents provide informed consent for participation. Randomization: Participating children are randomized 1:1:1 through computer randomization to either nebulized isotonic saline, nasal irrigation with isotonic saline or no isotonic saline therapy at all. Participating children will have a nasal sample collected and tested for a panel of viral pathogens. Excess material (1 ml nasal lining fluid) from upper airway respiratory samples will be stored in a research biobank until 31.12.2030 and used for sub-phenotyping of bronchiolitis and for developing personalized treatment and prediction of later asthma by means of host transcriptomics and metabolomics, 16S sequencing of the airway microbiome and meta-transcriptomics. All other treatment is given according to standard of care guidelines. Sample size: By including 249 children in total (83 in each arm) the investigators can prove non-inferiority of nasal irrigation or nebulized saline relative to no saline with a non-inferiority limit of 12 hours admission, alpha 2.5% and a power of 80%. The investigators aim to include 300 children in total to account for dropouts. Recruitment: Children will only be included if both parents provide informed consent. Perspectives: This study may improve current practice for supportive treatment of children with bronchiolitis. If saline is found to be helpful, it may be implemented into global guidelines. If no effect of saline is found, physicians may stop spending resources and manpower on an ineffective and potentially unpleasant treatment. Second, if saline is effective, but nasal irrigation proves to be non-inferior to nebulization, it may also reduce the workload of nurses, and possibly duration of hospitalization, because the treatment can be delivered by the parents at home. Moreover, the parents are empowered to manage their child's illness themselves, potentially improving the experience of parents as well as the affected child.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
300
The intervention will constitute nebulized isotonic saline.
The intervention will constitute isotonic saline administered as nasal drops.
Duration of hospitalization
In hours
Time frame: 0-7 days typically (max 14 days)
Number of participants needing respiratory support
The need for respiratory support with nasal continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow oxygen therapy.
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Number of participants being readmitted after discharge
If readmitted to the hospital
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Respiratory severity score
Respiratory Severity Score with Heart Rate (RSS-HR), scale from 0-12, higher score means worse outcome.
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Number of participants needing oxygen therapy
Need for oxygen therapy
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Number of participants needing transfer to ICU or SICU
Transfer to the intensive care unit or semi-intensive care unit
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Health-related Quality of Life
Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire developed by Díez-Gandía et al. (PMID: 34488668) including 12 items. Item responses will be scored using the following algorithm (unweighted method): (1) Each response item will be assigned a value according to its gravity (1 = best level or 9 = worst level). (2) The sum of the scores will be standardized using the min-max normalization to a 0-1-point scale, with 1 indicating the best quality of life and 0 the worst.
Time frame: Up to one month after discharge
Fluid supplements
Requirement of fluid supplements either by nasogastric tube or intravenous
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
pCO2
Highest pCO2 measured
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Number of participants needing to switch treatment
Clinician-initiated switch to the opposite treatment from the one they were randomized to
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Number of participants with visible distress
Visible distress in the child during delivery of treatment
Time frame: During admission (up to day 14)
Parents satisfaction
Parents satisfaction with the given treatment, questionnaire developed by the investigators exploring satisfaction of 3 items on a scale from 1-10 (total score from 3-30) where higher score means better outcome.
Time frame: Up to one month after discharge
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.