Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors. According to the latest cancer report, the incidence and mortality rates of CRC are both ranked top 5 among malignant tumors worldwide and continue to rise. Patients who receive treatment in the early stage (stage I) have a 5-year survival rate of approximately 90%. However, for high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer patients, the 5-year survival rate is only 40%-70%, and almost half of the patients experience postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a small fraction of total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in peripheral blood circulation, carrying tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic information. It can usually be detected in the serum or plasma of tumor patients in peripheral blood. Studies have shown that methylation detection of plasma ctDNA can be used for predicting the efficacy and prognosis of tumor postoperatively, as well as for dynamic monitoring. Current methods for monitoring CRC recurrence include testing for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in blood and periodic computed tomography (CT) scans. However, due to the low sensitivity of CEA and the radiation and cost limitations of CT examination, the disease status of postoperative CRC patients cannot be well-monitored. ctDNA is a promising biomarker for monitoring the recurrence and metastasis of CRC. Research results have shown that ctDNA can be detected in nearly all subjects before surgery, and the changes in ctDNA levels are related to the extent of surgical resection. The detection of ctDNA after surgery generally indicates recurrence within one year. ctDNA may be a more reliable and sensitive indicator than the current standard biomarker CEA, providing a window for early intervention. This multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled cohort study uses a single-tube methylation-specific quantitative PCR (mqMSP) detection, which detects 10 different methylation markers and can quantitatively analyze plasma samples containing tumor DNA as low as 0.01%. This study will use the ctDNA methylation detection technology to conduct quantitative detection of ctDNA methylation in the plasma of enrolled patients, hoping to predict the recurrence and metastasis risk of patients at an earlier stage through ctDNA changes, and to explore the value of ctDNA detection in guiding postoperative follow-up for non-metastatic CRC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
584
ctDNA methylation detection is performed within one month before surgery, within one month after surgery, and every three months after surgery, for a period of 2 years.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGSecondary curative-intent rate
This study primarily evaluates whether ctDNA-informed surveillance after surgery increases the proportion of patients with CRC recurrence who receive curative-intent or metastasis-directed therapy, compared to the standard follow-up protocol within 2 years of initial surgery.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
TTCR
To exam whether ctDNA-guided surveillance leads to a reduced time to clinical recurrence (TTCR) compared to standard surveillance.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
DFS
To investigate ctDNA-based disease-free survival (ctDNA-DFS), CT-based disease-free survival (CT-DFS), and the difference between ctDNA-DFS and CT-DFS (△-DFS).
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Sensitivity of postoperative ctDNA monitoring for detecting recurrence
To investigate sensitivity of postoperative ctDNA monitoring for detecting recurrence (Sensitivity=Number of ctDNA-positive patients confirmed with recurrence by imaging/Total number of patients confirmed with recurrence by imaging).
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Specificity of postoperative ctDNA monitoring for detecting recurrence
To investigate specificity of postoperative ctDNA monitoring for detecting recurrence (Specificity= Number of ctDNA-negative patients confirmed without recurrence by imaging /Total number of patients confirmed without recurrence by imaging).
Time frame: Up to 60 months
OS
To exam whether 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) with ctDNA-guided surveillance is comparable to that achieved with standard CT-based monitoring.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Patient-reported outcomes (quality of life)
To assess patient-reported outcomes-quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)-in those receiving ctDNA-guided versus standard surveillance.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Patient-reported outcomes (fear of cancer recurrence)
To assess patient-reported outcomes-fear of cancer recurrence (FCRI)-in those receiving ctDNA-guided versus standard surveillance.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Patient-reported outcomes (cancer-related distress)
To assess patient-reported outcomes-cancer-related distress (IES-C)-in those receiving ctDNA-guided versus standard surveillance.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Patient-reported outcomes [emotional distress (PHQ-9 scales)]
To assess patient-reported outcomes-emotional distress (PHQ-9 scales)-in those receiving ctDNA-guided versus standard surveillance.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Patient-reported outcomes [emotional distress (GAD-7 scales)]
To assess patient-reported outcomes-emotional distress (GAD-7 scales)-in those receiving ctDNA-guided versus standard surveillance.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.