Augmented Reality (AR) Chile

Stanford University36 enrolled

Overview

This is an international, collaborative study evaluating the non-technical skills (NTS) of anesthesiology residents. The goal is to explore the capability of performing a remote, international AR simulation for the purpose of assessing NTS during a neonatal medical crisis. Simulation experts in the United States will facilitate the AR simulations with anesthesiology residents in Chile. The medical simulation itself is grounded in traditional best practices in accordance with the American Heart Association and Neonatal Resuscitation Program.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Educational Problems

Interventions

Augmented Reality (AR)OTHER

AR headset - a device that the participants will wear over their head and eyes and will add holographic elements to a live view of workplace training scenario

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 99 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * age above 18 Exclusion Criteria: * a history of severe motion sickness * currently have nausea, a history of seizures * wear corrective glasses (they are not compatible with the AR hardware).

Locations (1)

Lucile Parkard Children's Hospital

Stanford, California, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Individual performance of non-technical skills assessed by Anaesthetist Non-Technical Skills (ANTS)

The Anaesthetist Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) tool previously published by Fletcher et al. translated in French. The ANTS scoring system uses four categories assessing task management, teamworking, situation awareness and decision-making (1 to 4 points by categories). The minimum score is 4 and the maximum 16

Time frame: immediately after simulation

Secondary Outcomes

Individual performance of non-technical skills assessed by Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)

The BARS scoring system uses four categories assessing situation awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork. The score ranges from 1 and 9 (1 = poor and 9 = excellent)

Time frame: immediately after simulation

System Usability Scale (SUS) Score

The scale has 10 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)

Time frame: immediately after simulation

ISO Ergonomic scale

The scale has 6 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)

Time frame: immediately after simulation

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.